These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34241446)

  • 1. Acoustophoresis in polymer-based microfluidic devices: Modeling and experimental validation.
    Lickert F; Ohlin M; Bruus H; Ohlsson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4281. PubMed ID: 34241446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the local pressure amplitude in microchannel acoustophoresis.
    Barnkob R; Augustsson P; Laurell T; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2010 Mar; 10(5):563-70. PubMed ID: 20162231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fabrication of Silicon Microfluidic Chips for Acoustic Particle Focusing Using Direct Laser Writing.
    Fornell A; Söderbäck P; Liu Z; De Albuquerque Moreira M; Tenje M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 31972982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microparticle Acoustophoresis in Aluminum-Based Acoustofluidic Devices with PDMS Covers.
    Bodé WN; Jiang L; Laurell T; Bruus H
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 32168805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of microparticle radius and microchannel height on SSAW-based acoustophoretic aggregation.
    Dong J; Liang D; Yang X; Sun C
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Dec; 117():106547. PubMed ID: 34419898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Nama N; Barnkob R; Mao Z; Kähler CJ; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2700-9. PubMed ID: 26001199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dominated acoustophoresis driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Guo J; Kang Y; Ai Y
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2015 Oct; 455():203-11. PubMed ID: 26070191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustophoresis of disk-shaped microparticles: A numerical and experimental study of acoustic radiation forces and torques.
    Garbin A; Leibacher I; Hahn P; Le Ferrand H; Studart A; Dual J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2759-69. PubMed ID: 26627752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microfluidic resonant cavities enable acoustophoresis on a disposable superstrate.
    Witte C; Reboud J; Wilson R; Cooper JM; Neale SL
    Lab Chip; 2014 Nov; 14(21):4277-83. PubMed ID: 25224539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thin film piezoelectrics for bulk acoustic wave (BAW) acoustophoresis.
    Reichert P; Deshmukh D; Lebovitz L; Dual J
    Lab Chip; 2018 Dec; 18(23):3655-3667. PubMed ID: 30374500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical study of the coupling layer between transducer and chip in acoustofluidic devices.
    Bodé WN; Bruus H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3096. PubMed ID: 34241126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustophoresis in wet-etched glass chips.
    Evander M; Lenshof A; Laurell T; Nilsson J
    Anal Chem; 2008 Jul; 80(13):5178-85. PubMed ID: 18489126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical study of bulk acoustofluidic devices driven by thin-film transducers and whole-system resonance modes.
    Steckel AG; Bruus H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):634. PubMed ID: 34340467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of microchannel height on the acoustophoretic motion of sub-micron particles.
    Lai TW; Tennakoon T; Chan KC; Liu CH; Chao CYH; Fu SC
    Ultrasonics; 2024 Jan; 136():107126. PubMed ID: 37553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound-induced acoustophoretic motion of microparticles in three dimensions.
    Muller PB; Rossi M; Marín AG; Barnkob R; Augustsson P; Laurell T; Kähler CJ; Bruus H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Aug; 88(2):023006. PubMed ID: 24032923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical and experimental analysis of a hybrid material acoustophoretic device for manipulation of microparticles.
    Barani A; Mosaddegh P; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Sepehrirahnama S; Sanati-Nezhad A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22048. PubMed ID: 34764352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constant-Power versus Constant-Voltage Actuation in Frequency Sweeps for Acoustofluidic Applications.
    Lickert F; Bruus H; Rossi M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2022 Nov; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 36363908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facile microfluidic channels for acoustophoresis on a budget.
    Samarasekera C; Yeow JT
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015 Oct; 17(5):99. PubMed ID: 26354878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis.
    Antfolk M; Muller PB; Augustsson P; Bruus H; Laurell T
    Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2791-9. PubMed ID: 24895052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Particle-size-dependent acoustophoretic motion and depletion of micro- and nano-particles at long timescales.
    Qiu W; Bruus H; Augustsson P
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jul; 102(1-1):013108. PubMed ID: 32794927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.