These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34241446)

  • 21. Toward optimal acoustophoretic microparticle manipulation by exploiting asymmetry.
    Tahmasebipour A; Friedrich L; Begley M; Bruus H; Meinhart C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jul; 148(1):359. PubMed ID: 32752779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces.
    Muller PB; Barnkob R; Jensen MJ; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4617-27. PubMed ID: 23010952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of silicon, glass, FR4, PDMS and PMMA as a chip material for acoustic particle/cell manipulation in microfluidics.
    Açıkgöz HN; Karaman A; Şahin MA; Çaylan ÖR; Büke GC; Yıldırım E; Eroğlu İC; Erson-Bensan AE; Çetin B; Özer MB
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Mar; 129():106911. PubMed ID: 36528906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustophoresis in shallow microchannels.
    Koklu M; Sabuncu AC; Beskok A
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2010 Nov; 351(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 20804984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-dimensional spatial manipulation of microparticles in continuous flows in acoustofluidic systems.
    Gao L; Wyatt Shields C; Johnson LM; Graves SW; Yellen BB; López GP
    Biomicrofluidics; 2015 Jan; 9(1):014105. PubMed ID: 25713687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigation of polymer-shelled microbubble motions in acoustophoresis.
    Kothapalli SV; Wiklund M; Janerot-Sjoberg B; Paradossi G; Grishenkov D
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():275-83. PubMed ID: 27261567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Flexural wave-based soft attractor walls for trapping microparticles and cells.
    Aghakhani A; Cetin H; Erkoc P; Tombak GI; Sitti M
    Lab Chip; 2021 Feb; 21(3):582-596. PubMed ID: 33355319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An extended view for acoustofluidic particle manipulation: Scenarios for actuation modes and device resonance phenomenon for bulk-acoustic-wave devices.
    Özer MB; Çetin B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Apr; 149(4):2802. PubMed ID: 33940873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Controlled Lateral Positioning of Microparticles Inside Droplets Using Acoustophoresis.
    Fornell A; Nilsson J; Jonsson L; Periyannan Rajeswari PK; Joensson HN; Tenje M
    Anal Chem; 2015 Oct; 87(20):10521-6. PubMed ID: 26422760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acoustophoretic Control of Microparticle Transport Using Dual-Wavelength Surface Acoustic Wave Devices.
    Hsu JC; Hsu CH; Huang YW
    Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 30642118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization Analysis of Particle Separation Parameters for a Standing Surface Acoustic Wave Acoustofluidic Chip.
    Han J; Hu H; Lei Y; Huang Q; Fu C; Gai C; Ning J
    ACS Omega; 2023 Jan; 8(1):311-323. PubMed ID: 36643460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficient coupling of acoustic modes in microfluidic channel devices.
    Bora M; Shusteff M
    Lab Chip; 2015 Aug; 15(15):3192-202. PubMed ID: 26118358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental and numerical studies on standing surface acoustic wave microfluidics.
    Mao Z; Xie Y; Guo F; Ren L; Huang PH; Chen Y; Rufo J; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2016 Feb; 16(3):515-24. PubMed ID: 26698361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring acoustic energy density in microchannel acoustophoresis using a simple and rapid light-intensity method.
    Barnkob R; Iranmanesh I; Wiklund M; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2012 Jul; 12(13):2337-44. PubMed ID: 22522812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 3D numerical simulation of acoustophoretic motion induced by boundary-driven acoustic streaming in standing surface acoustic wave microfluidics.
    Namnabat MS; Moghimi Zand M; Houshfar E
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13326. PubMed ID: 34172758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impedance matched channel walls in acoustofluidic systems.
    Leibacher I; Schatzer S; Dual J
    Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24310918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional focusing of particles using negative dielectrophoretic force in a microfluidic chip with insulating microstructures and dual planar microelectrodes.
    Jen CP; Weng CH; Huang CT
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(18):2428-35. PubMed ID: 21874653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Quantitative Study of the Secondary Acoustic Radiation Force on Biological Cells during Acoustophoresis.
    Saeidi D; Saghafian M; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Wiklund M
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32019234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microchannel acoustophoresis does not impact survival or function of microglia, leukocytes or tumor cells.
    Burguillos MA; Magnusson C; Nordin M; Lenshof A; Augustsson P; Hansson MJ; Elmér E; Lilja H; Brundin P; Laurell T; Deierborg T
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64233. PubMed ID: 23724038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dielectrophoresis Multipath Focusing of Microparticles through Perforated Electrodes in Microfluidic Channels.
    Alazzam A; Al-Khaleel M; Riahi MK; Mathew B; Gawanmeh A; Nerguizian V
    Biosensors (Basel); 2019 Aug; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 31394810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.