249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34241780)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cemiplimab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 Expression Levels of at Least 50.
Wang L; Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Li S; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4354-4365. PubMed ID: 34241780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First-line Cemiplimab versus Standard Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with at Least 50% Programmed Cell Death Receptor Ligand-1 Positivity: Analysis of Cost-effectiveness.
Zhang M; Liu X; Wen F; Wu Q; Zhou K; Bai L; Li Q
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2022 Mar; 34(3):e123-e129. PubMed ID: 34736841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50.
Kuznik A; Smare C; Chen CI; Venkatachalam M; Keeping S; Atsou K; Xu Y; Wilson F; Guyot P; Chan K; Glowienka E; Konidaris G
Value Health; 2022 Feb; 25(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 35094793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic evaluation of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy regimen for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Lang Y; Lin Y; Deng M; Liu X
BMC Cancer; 2024 Feb; 24(1):236. PubMed ID: 38383374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-Line Atezolizumab for Metastatic NSCLC with High PD-L1 Expression: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Peng Y; Zeng X; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
Adv Ther; 2021 May; 38(5):2447-2457. PubMed ID: 33821431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pembrolizumab vs cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression levels of at least 50%: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():878054. PubMed ID: 36226060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.
Wan N; Zhang TT; Hua SH; Lu ZL; Ji B; Li LX; Lu LQ; Huang WJ; Jiang J; Li J
Cancer Med; 2020 Mar; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 31945265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.
Weng X; Luo S; Lin S; Zhong L; Li M; Xin R; Huang P; Xu X
Oncol Res; 2020 Mar; 28(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 31610828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cemiplimab as Second-Line Therapy for Patients with Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A United States-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhou Y; Zhu H
Adv Ther; 2023 Apr; 40(4):1838-1849. PubMed ID: 36870042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic Evaluation of First-Line Camrelizumab for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in China.
Xiang G; Gu L; Chen X; Wang F; Chen B; Zhao J; Lu Y; Chang F; Zhu Y
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():743558. PubMed ID: 34957008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. First-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from China.
Yang Z; Zhu Y; Xiang G; Hua T; Ni J; Zhao J; Lu Y; Wu Y; Chang F
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Oct; 21(5):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 33682554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line pembrolizumab treatment for PD-L1 positive, non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liao W; Huang J; Hutton D; Li Q
J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 30646794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-line pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the UK health care perspective.
Hu X; Hay JW
Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():166-171. PubMed ID: 30089590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy in the non-small-cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 tumor proportion scores.
Zhou K; Jiang C; Li Q
Lung Cancer; 2019 Oct; 136():98-101. PubMed ID: 31476529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First-Line ICI Monotherapies for Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients With PD-L1 of at Least 50%: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Liu Q; Zhou Z; Luo X; Yi L; Peng L; Wan X; Tan C; Zeng X
Front Pharmacol; 2021; 12():788569. PubMed ID: 34992538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
