These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34242219)

  • 1. Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers' views.
    Fàbregues S; Escalante-Barrios EL; Molina-Azorin JF; Hong QN; Verd JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0252014. PubMed ID: 34242219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
    Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring health researchers' perceptions of policymaking in Argentina: a qualitative study.
    Corluka A; Hyder AA; Winch PJ; Segura E
    Health Policy Plan; 2014 Sep; 29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii40-9. PubMed ID: 25274639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appraising the quality of mixed methods research in nursing: A qualitative case study of nurse researchers' views.
    Fàbregues S; Paré MH
    Nurs Inq; 2018 Oct; 25(4):e12247. PubMed ID: 29927008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review.
    Levitt HM; Morrill Z; Collins KM; Rizo JL
    J Couns Psychol; 2021 Apr; 68(3):357-370. PubMed ID: 34043379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An atlas of health inequalities and health disparities research: "How is this all getting done in silos, and why?".
    Collyer TA; Smith KE
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Nov; 264():113330. PubMed ID: 32971486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research.
    Dawson L; Kass NE
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 61(6):1211-22. PubMed ID: 15970232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analysis, complexity, and heterogeneity: a qualitative interview study of researchers' methodological values and practices.
    Lorenc T; Felix L; Petticrew M; Melendez-Torres GJ; Thomas J; Thomas S; O'Mara-Eves A; Richardson M
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):192. PubMed ID: 27852314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Researchers' perspectives on public involvement in health research in Singapore: The argument for a community-based approach.
    Luna Puerta L; Bartlam B; Smith HE
    Health Expect; 2019 Aug; 22(4):666-675. PubMed ID: 31322811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delirium researchers' perspectives of the challenges in delirium biomarker research: A qualitative study.
    Amgarth-Duff I; Hosie A; Caplan GA; Agar M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0243254. PubMed ID: 33826629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. COMPare: Qualitative analysis of researchers' responses to critical correspondence on a cohort of 58 misreported trials.
    Goldacre B; Drysdale H; Marston C; Mahtani KR; Dale A; Milosevic I; Slade E; Hartley P; Heneghan C
    Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):124. PubMed ID: 30760328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "About sixty per cent I want to do it": Health researchers' attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)-A qualitative interview study.
    Boylan AM; Locock L; Thomson R; Staniszewska S
    Health Expect; 2019 Aug; 22(4):721-730. PubMed ID: 30927334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Writing to template: Researchers' negotiation of procedural research ethics.
    Chiumento A; Rahman A; Frith L
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 255():112980. PubMed ID: 32311514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making.
    Maggio LA; Artino AR; Watling CJ; Driessen EW; O'Brien BC
    Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 53(12):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 31475382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Researchers' needs for resource discovery and collaboration tools: a qualitative investigation of translational scientists.
    Bhavnani SK; Warden M; Zheng K; Hill M; Athey BD
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):e75. PubMed ID: 22668750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and public involvement in data collection for health services research: a descriptive study.
    Garfield S; Jheeta S; Jacklin A; Bischler A; Norton C; Franklin BD
    Res Involv Engagem; 2015; 1():8. PubMed ID: 29062497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processes and challenges of the interaction betweeen research and policy from the perspective of researchers.
    Angulo-Tuesta A; Santos LMP; Iturri JA
    Cien Saude Colet; 2018 Jan; 23(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29267807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific Cooperation and the Co-production of Scientific Outcomes for Physical Activity Promotion: Results From a Transdisciplinary Research Consortium.
    Ferschl S; Till M; Abu-Omar K; Pfeifer K; Gelius P
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():604855. PubMed ID: 34178910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.
    Satalkar P; Shaw D
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):72. PubMed ID: 31619226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.