BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34242234)

  • 21. Evaluation of microfiber release from jeans: the impact of different washing conditions.
    Periyasamy AP
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Nov; 28(41):58570-58582. PubMed ID: 34115293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics.
    De Falco F; Gullo MP; Gentile G; Di Pace E; Cocca M; Gelabert L; Brouta-Agnésa M; Rovira A; Escudero R; Villalba R; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A; Gavignano S; Tonin C; Avella M
    Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():916-925. PubMed ID: 29107418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microfiber Pollution: A Systematic Literature Review to Overcome the Complexities in Knit Design to Create Solutions for Knit Fabrics.
    Allen E; Henninger CE; Garforth A; Asuquo E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Mar; 58(9):4031-4045. PubMed ID: 38381002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microfibers generated from the laundering of cotton, rayon and polyester based fabrics and their aquatic biodegradation.
    Zambrano MC; Pawlak JJ; Daystar J; Ankeny M; Cheng JJ; Venditti RA
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2019 May; 142():394-407. PubMed ID: 31232317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Detection, characterization and possible biofragmentation of synthetic microfibers released from domestic laundering wastewater as an emerging source of marine pollution.
    Mishra S; Dash D; Das AP
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Dec; 185(Pt A):114254. PubMed ID: 36306713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Release of polyester and cotton fibers from textiles in machine washings.
    Sillanpää M; Sainio P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(23):19313-19321. PubMed ID: 28669092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electric clothes dryers: An underestimated source of microfiber pollution.
    Kapp KJ; Miller RZ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239165. PubMed ID: 33027292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of microplastics release from polyester fabrics: The impact of different washing conditions.
    Dalla Fontana G; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():113960. PubMed ID: 32375087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Emissions of microplastic fibers from microfiber fleece during domestic washing.
    Pirc U; Vidmar M; Mozer A; Kržan A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(21):22206-22211. PubMed ID: 27658400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wastewater treatment plant effluent and microfiber pollution: focus on industry-specific wastewater.
    Ramasamy R; Aragaw TA; Balasaraswathi Subramanian R
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(34):51211-51233. PubMed ID: 35606585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are We Underestimating Anthropogenic Microfiber Pollution? A Critical Review of Occurrence, Methods, and Reporting.
    Athey SN; Erdle LM
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Apr; 41(4):822-837. PubMed ID: 34289522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Synthetic microfiber emissions from denim industrial washing processes: An overlooked microplastic source within the manufacturing process of blue jeans.
    Grillo JF; López-Ordaz A; Hernández AJ; Catarí E; Sabino MA; Ramos R
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Aug; 884():163815. PubMed ID: 37121319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of quantification method on microfiber assessment - A comparative analysis between mass and count based methods.
    Rathinamoorthy R; Raja Balasaraswathi S
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 347():119040. PubMed ID: 37751666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Textile microfibers reaching aquatic environments: A new estimation approach.
    Belzagui F; Gutiérrez-Bouzán C; Álvarez-Sánchez A; Vilaseca M
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Oct; 265(Pt B):114889. PubMed ID: 32505958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tracking the distribution of microfiber pollution in a southern Lake Michigan watershed through the analysis of water, sediment and air.
    Peller JR; Eberhardt L; Clark R; Nelson C; Kostelnik E; Iceman C
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Sep; 21(9):1549-1559. PubMed ID: 31363723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: Effects of fabric type and washing conditions.
    Napper IE; Thompson RC
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Nov; 112(1-2):39-45. PubMed ID: 27686821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microplastic emissions from household washing machines: preliminary findings from Greater Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).
    Praveena SM; Syahira Asmawi M; Chyi JLY
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(15):18518-18522. PubMed ID: 32935209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Synthetic Microfiber Material Influences Ingestion by Freshwater Worms.
    Martinez SA; Simon CJ; Cohen RA
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2023 Apr; 110(5):87. PubMed ID: 37119338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantification of microfibre release from textiles during domestic laundering.
    Hazlehurst A; Tiffin L; Sumner M; Taylor M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43932-43949. PubMed ID: 36680713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laundering and textile parameters influence fibers release in household washings.
    Cesa FS; Turra A; Checon HH; Leonardi B; Baruque-Ramos J
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Feb; 257():113553. PubMed ID: 31761586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.