These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34242757)
1. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design. Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey. Büchter RB; Rombey T; Mathes T; Khalil H; Lunny C; Pollock D; Puljak L; Tricco AC; Pieper D J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():214-224. PubMed ID: 37286149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews. van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are systematic review and guideline development tools useful? A Guidelines International Network survey of user preferences. Munn Z; Brandt L; Kuijpers T; Whittington C; Wiles L; Karge T; JBI Evid Implement; 2020 Sep; 18(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 32487964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies? O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review. Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review. Yao X; Kumar MV; Su E; Flores Miranda A; Saha A; Sussman J Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102511. PubMed ID: 38071872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research. Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses. Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). O'Connor AM; Glasziou P; Taylor M; Thomas J; Spijker R; Wolfe MS Syst Rev; 2020 May; 9(1):100. PubMed ID: 32366302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR). Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P; Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews. Mickan S; Tilson JK; Atherton H; Roberts NW; Heneghan C J Med Internet Res; 2013 Oct; 15(10):e212. PubMed ID: 24165786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis. Arno A; Elliott J; Wallace B; Turner T; Thomas J Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):16. PubMed ID: 33419479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]