136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34242757)
1. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey.
Scott AM; Forbes C; Clark J; Carter M; Glasziou P; Munn Z
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():80-94. PubMed ID: 34242757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: a mixed method design.
Cleo G; Scott AM; Islam F; Julien B; Beller E
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):145. PubMed ID: 31221212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation.
Harrison H; Griffin SJ; Kuhn I; Usher-Smith JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 31931747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic reviewers used various approaches to data extraction and expressed several research needs: a survey.
Büchter RB; Rombey T; Mathes T; Khalil H; Lunny C; Pollock D; Puljak L; Tricco AC; Pieper D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():214-224. PubMed ID: 37286149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usage of automation tools in systematic reviews.
van Altena AJ; Spijker R; Olabarriaga SD
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 30561081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving toward the automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the second meeting of International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 29316980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Ouzzani M; Hammady H; Fedorowicz Z; Elmagarmid A
Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 5(1):210. PubMed ID: 27919275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are systematic review and guideline development tools useful? A Guidelines International Network survey of user preferences.
Munn Z; Brandt L; Kuijpers T; Whittington C; Wiles L; Karge T;
JBI Evid Implement; 2020 Sep; 18(3):345-352. PubMed ID: 32487964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A question of trust: can we build an evidence base to gain trust in systematic review automation technologies?
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Gilbert SB; Hutton B
Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 8(1):143. PubMed ID: 31215463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.
Yao X; Kumar MV; Su E; Flores Miranda A; Saha A; Sussman J
Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102511. PubMed ID: 38071872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Software tools for literature screening in systematic reviews in biomedical research.
Van der Mierden S; Tsaioun K; Bleich A; Leenaars CHC
ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):508-517. PubMed ID: 31113000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A narrative review of recent tools and innovations toward automating living systematic reviews and evidence syntheses.
Schmidt L; Sinyor M; Webb RT; Marshall C; Knipe D; Eyles EC; John A; Gunnell D; Higgins JPT
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2023 Sep; 181():65-75. PubMed ID: 37596160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Still moving toward automation of the systematic review process: a summary of discussions at the third meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Tsafnat G; Gilbert SB; Thayer KA; Shemilt I; Thomas J; Glasziou P; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 8(1):57. PubMed ID: 30786933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A focus on cross-purpose tools, automated recognition of study design in multiple disciplines, and evaluation of automation tools: a summary of significant discussions at the fourth meeting of the International Collaboration for Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
O'Connor AM; Glasziou P; Taylor M; Thomas J; Spijker R; Wolfe MS
Syst Rev; 2020 May; 9(1):100. PubMed ID: 32366302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR).
Beller E; Clark J; Tsafnat G; Adams C; Diehl H; Lund H; Ouzzani M; Thayer K; Thomas J; Turner T; Xia J; Robinson K; Glasziou P;
Syst Rev; 2018 May; 7(1):77. PubMed ID: 29778096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews.
Mickan S; Tilson JK; Atherton H; Roberts NW; Heneghan C
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Oct; 15(10):e212. PubMed ID: 24165786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The views of health guideline developers on the use of automation in health evidence synthesis.
Arno A; Elliott J; Wallace B; Turner T; Thomas J
Syst Rev; 2021 Jan; 10(1):16. PubMed ID: 33419479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
