187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34244820)
1. The 1-h fraud detection challenge.
van der Heyden MAG
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Aug; 394(8):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 34244820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The importance of being earnest in post-publication review: scientific fraud and the scourges of anonymity and excuses.
Stebbing J; Sanders DA
Oncogene; 2018 Feb; 37(6):695-696. PubMed ID: 29035386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data.
Williams CL; Casadevall A; Jackson S
J Clin Invest; 2019 Mar; 129(5):1805-1807. PubMed ID: 30907748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Retractions due to errors and frauds].
Decullier E; Samson G; Huot L
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):847-52. PubMed ID: 22841376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraud in science.
Altman L; Melcher L
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Publisher fraud. The publication of falsified medical research results].
Diehl V; Schütt I; Walshe R
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 125(38):1112-4. PubMed ID: 11147362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. End of 2016: Can We Save Research from Predators in 2017?
Memon AR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1339-1345. PubMed ID: 28616840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How criminal science publishing gangs damage the genesis of knowledge and technology-a call to action to restore trust.
Sabel BA; Seifert R
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2021 Nov; 394(11):2147-2151. PubMed ID: 34554267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher.
Mutch WA
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):782-4, 784-8. PubMed ID: 21643872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cases of fraud in publications: From Darsee to Poldermans].
Bonnet F; Samama CM
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):816-20. PubMed ID: 22727915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data falsification and question on academic integrity.
Nurunnabi M; Hossain MA
Account Res; 2019 Feb; 26(2):108-122. PubMed ID: 30595069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud inquiry leaves online paper in the ether.
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2002 Aug; 418(6901):907. PubMed ID: 12198509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2010; 25(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 20388454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethics in publication.
Spångberg LS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):797-8. PubMed ID: 20451839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Fraudulent publication in medical journals].
Becerril-Ángeles M; García-Gómez F
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2014; 52(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 24758857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of scientific publication after the human stem cell scandal.
Benítez-Bribiesca L; Modiano-Esquenazi M
Arch Med Res; 2006 May; 37(4):423-4. PubMed ID: 16624638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Caging the pack.
Nelson B
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 27294405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
