These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34244820)
21. Pitfalls and Misconducts in Medical Writing. Lazarides MK; Gougoudi E; Papanas N Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2019 Dec; 18(4):350-353. PubMed ID: 31464160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills. Byrne JA; Park Y; Richardson RAK; Pathmendra P; Sun M; Stoeger T Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Nov; 50(21):12058-12070. PubMed ID: 36477580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ethical dilemmas in scientific publication: pitfalls and solutions for editors. Gollogly L; Momen H Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():24-9. PubMed ID: 16924299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications]. Driessen O Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Nov; 138(47):2365-6. PubMed ID: 7969640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Editors call for misconduct watchdog. Williams N Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty. Miller DR Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2011 Apr; 24(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 21252647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Wells F Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1997 Jan; 43(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9056045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry. Abbott A; Schwarz J Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Fraud in biomedical literature]. Vucković-Dekić L Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2006 May; 134 Suppl 1():50-6. PubMed ID: 16796165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientific authorship. Part 1. A window into scientific fraud? Claxton LD Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 15652224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Report from the Working Group of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan for the investigation of fraud in research papers. Tsurimoto T; Itoh T; Katayama T; Kimura H; Shinohara A Genes Cells; 2009 Aug; 14(8):903-8. PubMed ID: 19695023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications. Fanelli D; Costas R; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):771-789. PubMed ID: 29460082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud. Dayton L Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Random audit of papers proposed. Culliton BJ Science; 1988 Nov; 242(4879):657-8. PubMed ID: 3187510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Fraud in scientific research papers: Playing the «cops and robbers» game]. Abad Gurumeta A; Calvo Vecino JM Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2015 Dec; 62(10):549-50. PubMed ID: 26464026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Editor's note. "Report from the Working Group of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan for the Investigation of Fraud in the Research Papers". Yanagida M Genes Cells; 2009 Aug; 14(8):901. PubMed ID: 19695022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publishing]. Overbeke AJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Sep; 138(36):1822-6. PubMed ID: 7935910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]