These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34245031)

  • 1. Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of binary outcomes.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Hoang AQ; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(24):5397-5416. PubMed ID: 34245031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size considerations for matched-pair cluster randomization design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 May; 104():106336. PubMed ID: 33689919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size considerations for paired experimental design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.
    Zhu H; Xu X; Ahn C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):589-598. PubMed ID: 28956503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3395-3404. PubMed ID: 31033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.
    Blaha O; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4860-4885. PubMed ID: 35908796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size requirements for testing treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Maleyeff L; Wang R; Haneuse S; Li F
    Stat Med; 2023 Nov; 42(27):5054-5083. PubMed ID: 37974475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and sample size for GEE analysis of incomplete paired outcomes in 2 × 2 crossover trials.
    Tang Y
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Jul; 20(4):820-839. PubMed ID: 33738918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.
    Tong J; Li F; Harhay MO; Tong G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 37024809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal modeling of cluster-period means and intraclass correlations in stepped wedge designs with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Yu H; Rathouz PJ; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Biostatistics; 2022 Jul; 23(3):772-788. PubMed ID: 33527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Liu J; Liu L; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3733-3746. PubMed ID: 31162709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation for cluster randomization trials with a time-to-event endpoint.
    Li J; Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(25):3608-3623. PubMed ID: 33463748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size calculation for before-after experiments with partially overlapping cohorts.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2018 Jan; 64():274-280. PubMed ID: 26416696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power analysis for cluster randomized trials with multiple binary co-primary endpoints.
    Li D; Cao J; Zhang S
    Biometrics; 2020 Dec; 76(4):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 31872435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.