These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34245031)

  • 41. Incorporating pragmatic features into power analysis for cluster randomized trials with a count outcome.
    Li D; Zhang S; Cao J
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):4037-4050. PubMed ID: 33165949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluating tests for cluster-randomized trials with few clusters under generalized linear mixed models with covariate adjustment: A simulation study.
    Qiu H; Cook AJ; Bobb JF
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(2):201-215. PubMed ID: 37933766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Statistical power and sample size requirements to detect an intervention by time interaction in four-level longitudinal cluster randomized trials.
    Ghosh S; Mukhopadhyay S; Majumder P; Wang B
    Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2542-2556. PubMed ID: 35441378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
    Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sample size determination for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials in pragmatic settings.
    Wang J; Cao J; Zhang S; Ahn C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1609-1623. PubMed ID: 34139916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. When should matching be used in the design of cluster randomized trials?
    Chondros P; Ukoumunne OC; Gunn JM; Carlin JB
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(26):5765-5778. PubMed ID: 34390264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sample size calculations for randomised trials including both independent and paired data.
    Yelland LN; Sullivan TR; Price DJ; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1227-1239. PubMed ID: 28074483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sample size determination for a matched-pairs study with incomplete data using exact approach.
    Shan G; Bernick C; Banks S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 28664985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sample size calculation for randomized trials via inverse probability of response weighting when outcome data are missing at random.
    Harrison LJ; Wang R
    Stat Med; 2023 May; 42(11):1802-1821. PubMed ID: 36880120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sample size and power considerations for cluster randomized trials with count outcomes subject to right truncation.
    Li F; Tong G
    Biom J; 2021 Jun; 63(5):1052-1071. PubMed ID: 33751620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An evaluation of constrained randomization for the design and analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li F; Turner EL; Heagerty PJ; Murray DM; Vollmer WM; DeLong ER
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3791-3806. PubMed ID: 28786223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. GEECORR: A SAS macro for regression models of correlated binary responses and within-cluster correlation using generalized estimating equations.
    Shing TL; Preisser JS; Zink RC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106276. PubMed ID: 34325377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimating marginal proportions and intraclass correlations with clustered binary data.
    Carrasco JL; Pan Y; Abellana R
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):574-599. PubMed ID: 30537196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2779-2792. PubMed ID: 32578264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
    Leyrat C; Morgan KE; Leurent B; Kahan BC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):321-331. PubMed ID: 29025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Sample size considerations for stepped wedge designs with subclusters.
    Davis-Plourde K; Taljaard M; Li F
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 34719017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.