153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34245143)
1. Performance evaluation of transcriptomics data normalization for survival risk prediction.
Ni A; Qin LX
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34245143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Depth normalization of small RNA sequencing: using data and biology to select a suitable method.
Düren Y; Lederer J; Qin LX
Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jun; 50(10):e56. PubMed ID: 35188574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The sensitivity of transcriptomics BMD modeling to the methods used for microarray data normalization.
Mezencev R; Auerbach SS
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232955. PubMed ID: 32413060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On data normalization and batch-effect correction for tumor subtyping with microRNA data.
Wu Y; Yuen BW; Wei Y; Qin LX
NAR Genom Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 5(1):lqac100. PubMed ID: 36632610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Making External Validation Valid for Molecular Classifier Development.
Wu Y; Huang HC; Qin LX
JCO Precis Oncol; 2021 Aug; 5():. PubMed ID: 34377885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal consistency in microRNA expression analysis using reference-gene-based normalization.
Wang X; Gardiner EJ; Cairns MJ
Mol Biosyst; 2015 May; 11(5):1235-40. PubMed ID: 25797570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of normalization methods for analysis of microarrays containing a high degree of gene effects.
Ni TT; Lemon WJ; Shyr Y; Zhong TP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 9():505. PubMed ID: 19040742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ratio adjustment and calibration scheme for gene-wise normalization to enhance microarray inter-study prediction.
Cheng C; Shen K; Song C; Luo J; Tseng GC
Bioinformatics; 2009 Jul; 25(13):1655-61. PubMed ID: 19414534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feature-specific quantile normalization and feature-specific mean-variance normalization deliver robust bi-directional classification and feature selection performance between microarray and RNAseq data.
Skubleny D; Ghosh S; Spratlin J; Schiller DE; Rayat GR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):136. PubMed ID: 38549046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of normalization on miRNA microarray expression profiling.
Pradervand S; Weber J; Thomas J; Bueno M; Wirapati P; Lefort K; Dotto GP; Harshman K
RNA; 2009 Mar; 15(3):493-501. PubMed ID: 19176604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Study design and data analysis considerations for the discovery of prognostic molecular biomarkers: a case study of progression free survival in advanced serous ovarian cancer.
Qin LX; Levine DA
BMC Med Genomics; 2016 Jun; 9(1):27. PubMed ID: 27282150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to do quantile normalization correctly for gene expression data analyses.
Zhao Y; Wong L; Goh WWB
Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15534. PubMed ID: 32968196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of two-channel ChIP-on-chip and DNA methylation microarray normalization strategies.
Adriaens ME; Jaillard M; Eijssen LM; Mayer CD; Evelo CT
BMC Genomics; 2012 Jan; 13():42. PubMed ID: 22276688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical evaluation of data normalization methods for molecular classification.
Huang HC; Qin LX
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4584. PubMed ID: 29666754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
Huang HC; Wu Y; Yang Q; Qin LX
Front Genet; 2022; 13():838679. PubMed ID: 35938023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of normalization techniques for microRNA microarray data.
Rao Y; Lee Y; Jarjoura D; Ruppert AS; Liu CG; Hsu JC; Hagan JP
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2008; 7(1):Article22. PubMed ID: 18673291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of a novel multi-array normalization method based on spike-in control probes suitable for microRNA datasets with global decreases in expression.
Sewer A; Gubian S; Kogel U; Veljkovic E; Han W; Hengstermann A; Peitsch MC; Hoeng J
BMC Res Notes; 2014 May; 7():302. PubMed ID: 24886675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of biomarkers that distinguish chemical contaminants based on gene expression profiles.
Wei X; Ai J; Deng Y; Guan X; Johnson DR; Ang CY; Zhang C; Perkins EJ
BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15():248. PubMed ID: 24678894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benchmarking of cell type deconvolution pipelines for transcriptomics data.
Avila Cobos F; Alquicira-Hernandez J; Powell JE; Mestdagh P; De Preter K
Nat Commun; 2020 Nov; 11(1):5650. PubMed ID: 33159064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjustment of spurious correlations in co-expression measurements from RNA-Sequencing data.
Hsieh PH; Lopes-Ramos CM; Zucknick M; Sandve GK; Glass K; Kuijjer ML
Bioinformatics; 2023 Oct; 39(10):. PubMed ID: 37802917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
