These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34245479)

  • 21. T-wave area predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left bundle branch block.
    Engels EB; Végh EM; Van Deursen CJ; Vernooy K; Singh JP; Prinzen FW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 25230363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. His-bundle and left bundle pacing with optimized atrioventricular delay achieve superior electrical synchrony over endocardial and epicardial pacing in left bundle branch block patients.
    Strocchi M; Lee AWC; Neic A; Bouyssier J; Gillette K; Plank G; Elliott MK; Gould J; Behar JM; Sidhu B; Mehta V; Bishop MJ; Vigmond EJ; Rinaldi CA; Niederer SA
    Heart Rhythm; 2020 Nov; 17(11):1922-1929. PubMed ID: 32603781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-invasive three-dimensional electrical activation mapping to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response: site of latest left ventricular activation relative to pacing site.
    Parreira L; Tsyganov A; Artyukhina E; Vernooy K; Tondo C; Adragao P; Ascione C; Carmo P; Carvalho S; Egger M; Ferreira A; Ghossein M; Holm M; Kalinin V; Malakhova M; Meine M; Nunes S; Podolyak D; Revishvili A; Shapieva A; Stepanova V; van Stipdonk A; Taymasova I; Wouters P; Zubarev S; Leyva F; Auricchio A; Varma N
    Europace; 2023 Apr; 25(4):1458-1466. PubMed ID: 36857597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The QR-max index, a novel electrocardiographic index for the determination of left ventricular conduction delay and selection of cardiac resynchronization in patients with non-left bundle branch block.
    Pastore G; Maines M; Marcantoni L; Lanza D; Zanon F; Noventa F; Corbucci G; Rigatelli G; Baracca E; Zuin M; Picariello C; Carraro M; Conte L; Roncon L; Barold SS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Aug; 58(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 31807986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is determined by intrinsic electrical substrate rather than by its modification.
    Strik M; Ploux S; Huntjens PR; Nguyên UC; Frontera A; Eschalier R; Dubois R; Ritter P; Klotz N; Vernooy K; Haïssaguerre M; Crijns HJGM; Prinzen FW; Bordachar P
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 270():143-148. PubMed ID: 29895424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrical wavefront fusion in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Implications for optimization.
    Bank AJ; Gage RM; Schaefer AE; Burns KV; Brown CD
    J Electrocardiol; 2020; 61():47-56. PubMed ID: 32526538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rationale and design for ENHANCE CRT: QLV implant strategy for non-left bundle branch block patients.
    Singh JP; Berger RD; Doshi RN; Lloyd M; Moore D; Daoud EG;
    ESC Heart Fail; 2018 Dec; 5(6):1184-1190. PubMed ID: 30264456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coronary sinus activation patterns in patients with and without left bundle branch block undergoing electroanatomic mapping system-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.
    Del Greco M; Zorzi A; Di Matteo I; Cima A; Maines M; Angheben C; Catanzariti D
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Feb; 14(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 27989791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pacing prescription for cardiac resynchronization therapy: When RV stimulation matters.
    Varma N; Ghanem R; Jia P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 30(5):769-770. PubMed ID: 30661268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transseptal conduction as an important determinant for cardiac resynchronization therapy, as revealed by extensive electrical mapping in the dyssynchronous canine heart.
    Strik M; van Deursen CJ; van Middendorp LB; van Hunnik A; Kuiper M; Auricchio A; Prinzen FW
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Aug; 6(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 23873141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site.
    Zanon F; Baracca E; Pastore G; Marcantoni L; Fraccaro C; Lanza D; Picariello C; Aggio S; Roncon L; Dell'Avvocata F; Rigatelli G; Pacetta D; Noventa F; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2015 May; 12(5):975-81. PubMed ID: 25625721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preferred left ventricular lead position for upgrade from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Ogano M; Iwasaki YK; Okada T; Tanabe J; Shimizu W; Asai K
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Sep; 34(9):1925-1932. PubMed ID: 37449446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Site-specific differences in latency intervals during biventricular pacing: impact on paced QRS morphology and echo-optimized V-V interval.
    Herweg B; Ali R; Ilercil A; Madramootoo C; Cutro R; Weston MW; Barold SS
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2010 Nov; 33(11):1382-91. PubMed ID: 20735713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Application and efficacy of the adjustment on left ventricular electrical delay and the distance between right and left ventricular pacing polar in optimizing the left ventricular pacing polar].
    Yan XL; Liang YC; Yu HB; Xu BG; Gao Y; Liu R; Xu GQ; Wu M
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 48(8):669-674. PubMed ID: 32847323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart.
    Ploux S; Strik M; van Hunnik A; van Middendorp L; Kuiper M; Prinzen FW
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jan; 11(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 24120876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating strict and conventional left bundle branch block criteria using electrocardiographic simulations.
    Galeotti L; van Dam PM; Loring Z; Chan D; Strauss DG
    Europace; 2013 Dec; 15(12):1816-21. PubMed ID: 23703366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in pacing-induced left bundle branch block compared with intrinsic left bundle branch block.
    Ghani A; Delnoy PP; Ottervanger JP; Ramdat Misier AR; Smit JJ; Elvan A
    Europace; 2011 Oct; 13(10):1504-7. PubMed ID: 21527389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bipolar left ventricular pacing is associated with significant reduction in heart failure or death in CRT-D patients with LBBB.
    Jamé S; Kutyifa V; Aktas MK; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Al-Ahmad A; Zareba W; Moss A; Wang PJ
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Jul; 13(7):1468-74. PubMed ID: 26961303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distinctive Left Ventricular Activations Associated With ECG Pattern in Heart Failure Patients.
    Derval N; Duchateau J; Mahida S; Eschalier R; Sacher F; Lumens J; Cochet H; Denis A; Pillois X; Yamashita S; Komatsu Y; Ploux S; Amraoui S; Zemmoura A; Ritter P; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Jaïs P; Bordachar P
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28630171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intracardiac conduction time as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results of the BIO|SELECT pilot study.
    Soejima K; Kondo Y; Sasaki S; Adachi K; Kato R; Hagiwara N; Harada T; Kusano K; Miura F; Morishima I; Yoshitani K; Yotsukura A; Fujimoto M; Nishii N; Shimeno K; Ohe M; Tasaka H; Sasaki H; Schrader J; Ando K
    Heart Rhythm O2; 2021 Dec; 2(6Part A):588-596. PubMed ID: 34988503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.