These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34245660)

  • 21. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gruden T; Tomažič S; Sodnik J; Jakus G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106766. PubMed ID: 35785713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Driver trust in five driver assistance technologies following real-world use in four production vehicles.
    Kidd DG; Cicchino JB; Reagan IJ; Kerfoot LB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S44-S50. PubMed ID: 28339302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-Term Evaluation of Drivers' Behavioral Adaptation to an Adaptive Collision Avoidance System.
    Muslim H; Itoh M
    Hum Factors; 2021 Nov; 63(7):1295-1315. PubMed ID: 32484749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 17178651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.
    Zhao X; He R; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105783. PubMed ID: 33022511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
    Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Effects of Demands on Hazard Detection Performance.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):474-487. PubMed ID: 30307760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Which accuracy levels of positioning technologies do drivers really need in connected vehicle settings for safety?
    Wu C; Zhang W; You X; Du N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106106. PubMed ID: 34016444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of augmented reality cues to improve the safety of left-turn maneuvers in a connected environment: A driving simulator study.
    Calvi A; D'Amico F; Ferrante C; Bianchini Ciampoli L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105793. PubMed ID: 33017731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multi-agent traffic simulations to estimate the impact of automated technologies on safety.
    Kitajima S; Shimono K; Tajima J; Antona-Makoshi J; Uchida N
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S58-S64. PubMed ID: 31381431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.