These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34246222)

  • 1. Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.
    Mukkamala R; Kohl BA; Mahajan A
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 34246222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Greiwe G; Peters V; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Kubik M; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiac output estimation using multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform: a method comparison study in patients having off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery using intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution as the reference method.
    Saugel B; Heeschen J; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Greiwe G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):649-654. PubMed ID: 31456072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Milam AJ; Ghoddoussi F; Lucaj J; Narreddy S; Kumar N; Reddy V; Hakim J; Krishnan SH
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):514-529. PubMed ID: 32622708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.
    Cho YJ; Koo CH; Kim TK; Hong DM; Jeon Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
    Cannesson M; Attof Y; Rosamel P; Joseph P; Bastien O; Lehot JJ
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity of an arterial pressure waveform analysis device: does the puncture site play a role in the agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution measurements?
    Schramm S; Albrecht E; Frascarolo P; Chassot PG; Spahn DR
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 19700347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
    Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ability of the third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo software to track changes in cardiac output in cardiac surgery patients: a polar plot approach.
    Desebbe O; Henaine R; Keller G; Koffel C; Garcia H; Rosamel P; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Haftek M; Critchley LA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1122-7. PubMed ID: 24011911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Kusaka Y; Ohchi F; Minami T
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Apr; 33(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 30077561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of a cardiac output device using arterial pulse waveform analysis, Vigileo, in cardiac surgery compared to pulmonary arterial thermodilution.
    Hamm JB; Nguyen BV; Kiss G; Wargnier JP; Jauffroy A; Helaine L; Arvieux CC; Gueret G
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Mar; 38(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 20369763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a new software version of the FloTrac/Vigileo (version 3.02) and a comparison with previous data in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant surgery.
    Biancofiore G; Critchley LA; Lee A; Yang XX; Bindi LM; Esposito M; Bisà M; Meacci L; Mozzo R; Filipponi F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 21680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis: validation of the third-generation software in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Tsai YF; Su BC; Lin CC; Liu FC; Lee WC; Yu HP
    Transplant Proc; 2012 Mar; 44(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 22410036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for less-invasive cardiac output determination in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Mayer J; Boldt J; Beschmann R; Stephan A; Suttner S
    Br J Anaesth; 2009 Aug; 103(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 19482857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of Vigileo/Flotrac monitoring system in morbidly obese patients.
    Tejedor A; Rivas E; Ríos J; Arismendi E; Martinez-Palli G; Delgado S; Balust J
    J Crit Care; 2015 Jun; 30(3):562-6. PubMed ID: 25735614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
    Hadian M; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Mayer J; Boldt J; Schöllhorn T; Röhm KD; Mengistu AM; Suttner S
    Br J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 98(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 17218375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system™ and the Fick method in cardiac surgery patients.
    Maeda T; Hamaguchi E; Kubo N; Shimokawa A; Kanazawa H; Ohnishi Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Oct; 33(5):767-776. PubMed ID: 30406422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.