These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34246619)
1. Rethinking Autonomous Surgery: Focusing on Enhancement over Autonomy. Battaglia E; Boehm J; Zheng Y; Jamieson AR; Gahan J; Majewicz Fey A Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):696-705. PubMed ID: 34246619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of robotic surgery: From supervised paradigms to fully autonomous robotic approaches. Han J; Davids J; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Elson DS; Sodergren M Int J Med Robot; 2022 Apr; 18(2):e2358. PubMed ID: 34953033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of computer vision for semi-autonomous control of assistive robotic manipulators (ARMs). Bengtson SH; Bak T; Andreasen Struijk LNS; Moeslund TB Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Oct; 15(7):731-745. PubMed ID: 31268368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Advancements in robotic surgery: innovations, challenges and future prospects. Chatterjee S; Das S; Ganguly K; Mandal D J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):28. PubMed ID: 38231455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations. Kranzfelder M; Staub C; Fiolka A; Schneider A; Gillen S; Wilhelm D; Friess H; Knoll A; Feussner H Surg Endosc; 2013 May; 27(5):1681-8. PubMed ID: 23239307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room. Andras I; Mazzone E; van Leeuwen FWB; De Naeyer G; van Oosterom MN; Beato S; Buckle T; O'Sullivan S; van Leeuwen PJ; Beulens A; Crisan N; D'Hondt F; Schatteman P; van Der Poel H; Dell'Oglio P; Mottrie A World J Urol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2359-2366. PubMed ID: 31776737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Saeidi H; Opfermann JD; Kam M; Wei S; Leonard S; Hsieh MH; Kang JU; Krieger A Sci Robot; 2022 Jan; 7(62):eabj2908. PubMed ID: 35080901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Operational framework and training standard requirements for AI-empowered robotic surgery. O'Sullivan S; Leonard S; Holzinger A; Allen C; Battaglia F; Nevejans N; van Leeuwen FWB; Sajid MI; Friebe M; Ashrafian H; Heinsen H; Wichmann D; Hartnett M; Gallagher AG Int J Med Robot; 2020 Oct; 16(5):1-13. PubMed ID: 31144777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature. Moustris GP; Hiridis SC; Deliparaschos KM; Konstantinidis KM Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):375-92. PubMed ID: 21815238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery: current perspective and future directions. Bhandari M; Zeffiro T; Reddiboina M Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 31724999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Semi-Autonomous Stereotactic Brain Biopsy Robotic System With Enhanced Surgical Safety and Surgeon-Robot Collaboration. Xian Y; Zhang X; Luo X; Li J; Zou L; Xie K; Li J; Li Y; Huang Y; Chan DTM; Chan DYC; Li Z IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 70(12):3288-3299. PubMed ID: 37256817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Adaptive Human-Robotic Interaction Architecture for Augmenting Surgery Performance Using Real-Time Workload Sensing-Demonstration of a Semi-autonomous Suction Tool. Yang J; Barragan JA; Farrow JM; Sundaram CP; Wachs JP; Yu D Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1081-1102. PubMed ID: 36367971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic navigation during spine surgery: an update of literature. Zhang Q; Han XG; Fan MX; Zhao JW; Lang Z; Jiang JL; He D; Liu B; Tian W Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023 Jun; 20(6):427-432. PubMed ID: 37027325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. Leal Ghezzi T; Campos Corleta O World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2550-7. PubMed ID: 27177648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From the Dexterous Surgical Skill to the Battlefield-A Robotics Exploratory Study. Gonzalez GT; Kaur U; Rahman M; Venkatesh V; Sanchez N; Hager G; Xue Y; Voyles R; Wachs J Mil Med; 2021 Jan; 186(Suppl 1):288-294. PubMed ID: 33499518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward versatile cooperative surgical robotics: a review and future challenges. Schleer P; Drobinsky S; de la Fuente M; Radermacher K Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Oct; 14(10):1673-1686. PubMed ID: 30830511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A learning robot for cognitive camera control in minimally invasive surgery. Wagner M; Bihlmaier A; Kenngott HG; Mietkowski P; Scheikl PM; Bodenstedt S; Schiepe-Tiska A; Vetter J; Nickel F; Speidel S; Wörn H; Mathis-Ullrich F; Müller-Stich BP Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5365-5374. PubMed ID: 33904989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Ballantyne GH Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]