151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34247169)
21. The Value of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Improving the Detection of Anterior Prostate Cancer.
Zugor V; Kühn R; Engelhard K; Poth S; Bernat MM; Porres D; Labanaris AP
Anticancer Res; 2016 Aug; 36(8):4279-83. PubMed ID: 27466544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate volume predicts high grade prostate cancer both in digital rectal examination negative (ct1c) and positive (≥ct2) patients.
Yilmaz H; Ustuner M; Ciftci S; Yavuz U; Ozkan TA; Dillioglugil O
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(5):613-9. PubMed ID: 25498272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Compatibility of the radical prostatectomy specimen findings with digital rectal examination.
Hassanzadeh K; Hassanzadeh H; Salehi-Pourmehr H
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Nov; 149(17):15407-15412. PubMed ID: 37642726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography.
Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preoperative prediction of pathological tumor volume and stage in clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
McSherry SA; Levy F; Schiebler ML; Keefe B; Dent GA; Mohler JL
J Urol; 1991 Jul; 146(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 1711590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integration of MRI to clinical nomogram for predicting pathological stage before radical prostatectomy.
Lebacle C; Roudot-Thoraval F; Moktefi A; Bouanane M; De La Taille A; Salomon L
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1409-1415. PubMed ID: 27995303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
Konyalioglu E; Tarhan H; Cakmak O; Pala EE; Zorlu F
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 26200537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer - by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography?
Hsu CY; Joniau S; Oyen R; Roskams T; Van Poppel H
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):982-5. PubMed ID: 16945120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. "In-bore" MRI prostate biopsy is a safe preoperative clinical tool to exclude significant prostate cancer in symptomatic patients with benign prostatic obstruction before transurethral laser enucleation.
Porreca A; D'Agostino D; Vigo M; Corsi P; Romagnoli D; Del Rosso A; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Artibani W; Giampaoli M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Jan; 91(4):224-229. PubMed ID: 31937084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
Piert M; Montgomery J; Kunju LP; Siddiqui J; Rogers V; Rajendiran T; Johnson TD; Shao X; Davenport MS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1065-70. PubMed ID: 26985061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimation of clinically significant prostate volumes by digital rectal examination: a comparative prospective study.
Ahmad S; Manecksha RP; Cullen IM; Flynn RJ; McDermott TE; Grainger R; Thornhill JA
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6025-30. PubMed ID: 22166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stratification of prostate-specific antigen level and results of transrectal ultrasonography and digital rectal examination as predictors of positive prostate biopsy.
Clark TW; Goldenberg L; Cooperberg PL; Wong AD; Singer J
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1997 Aug; 48(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 9282157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.
Thimansson E; Bengtsson J; Baubeta E; Engman J; Flondell-Sité D; Bjartell A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2519-2528. PubMed ID: 36371606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men.
Catalona WJ; Richie JP; Ahmann FR; Hudson MA; Scardino PT; Flanigan RC; DeKernion JB; Ratliff TL; Kavoussi LR; Dalkin BL; Waters WB; MacFarlane MT; Southwick PC
J Urol; 2017 Feb; 197(2S):S200-S207. PubMed ID: 28012755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size.
Rodriguez E; Skarecky D; Narula N; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):501-3. PubMed ID: 18076916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low AUA symptom score independently predicts positive prostate needle biopsy: results from a racially diverse series of 411 patients.
Porter CR; Kim J
Urology; 2004 Jan; 63(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 14751356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic efficacy of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostatic fossa in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy.
Deliveliotis C; Manousakas T; Chrisofos M; Skolarikos A; Delis A; Dimopoulos C
World J Urol; 2007 Jun; 25(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 17440730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men?
Schouten MG; van der Leest M; Pokorny M; Hoogenboom M; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 28063613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
