These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34247409)

  • 1. Efficient, doubly robust estimation of the effect of dose switching for switchers in a randomized clinical trial.
    Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S
    Biom J; 2021 Oct; 63(7):1464-1475. PubMed ID: 34247409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
    Funk MJ; Westreich D; Wiesen C; Stürmer T; Brookhart MA; Davidian M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):761-7. PubMed ID: 21385832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative empirical likelihood method in missing response problems and causal inference.
    Ren K; Drummond CA; Brewster PS; Haller ST; Tian J; Cooper CJ; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):5009-5028. PubMed ID: 27417265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
    Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Doubly robust estimation of the weighted average treatment effect for a target population.
    Tao Y; Fu H
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 30302780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
    van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
    Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal inference for longitudinal data based on historical controls.
    Liu J; Zhang J; Mitchell A; Fang M; Tian L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):289-306. PubMed ID: 36469552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causal inference in case of near-violation of positivity: comparison of methods.
    Léger M; Chatton A; Le Borgne F; Pirracchio R; Lasocki S; Foucher Y
    Biom J; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1389-1403. PubMed ID: 34993990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the marginal hazard ratio by simultaneously using a set of propensity score models: A multiply robust approach.
    Shu D; Han P; Wang R; Toh S
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(5):1224-1242. PubMed ID: 33410157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A doubly robust estimator for the attributable benefit of a treatment regime.
    Brinkley J
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(29):5057-73. PubMed ID: 25382146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.
    Mao H; Li L; Greene T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2439-2454. PubMed ID: 29921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel estimand to adjust for rescue treatment in randomized clinical trials.
    Michiels H; Sotto C; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2257-2271. PubMed ID: 33567475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
    Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a monotone single-index model to stabilize the propensity score in missing data problems and causal inference.
    Qin J; Yu T; Li P; Liu H; Chen B
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1442-1458. PubMed ID: 30566258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.