These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34247856)

  • 1. Effect of variations in facial flow curves on the perceptions of smile esthetics by laypeople.
    Koseoglu M; Bayindir F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):486-494. PubMed ID: 34247856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of dental midline angulation towards the facial flow curve on the esthetics of an asymmetric face: Perspective of laypeople and orthodontists.
    Ntovas P; Karkazi F; Ozbilen EO; Lysy J; Gogolas N; Yilmaz HN; Papazoglou E; Coachman C
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):778-784. PubMed ID: 38059402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
    Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic evaluation of dental and gingival asymmetries.
    Fernandes L; Pinho T
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):221-231. PubMed ID: 25986710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saudi Children's and Their Parents' Perception of a Digitally Modified Photograph Model of Different Smiles with Different Anterior Teeth Alignments and Dental Appearances.
    Alnasser MA; AlDhelai TA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 37189012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of buccolingual inclinations of maxillary canines and premolars on perceived smile attractiveness.
    Xu H; Han X; Wang Y; Shu R; Jing Y; Tian Y; Andrews WA; Andrews LF; Bai D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 25636551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of gingival margin asymmetries on the smile esthetic perception of dental professionals and lay people.
    Koseoglu M; Bayindir F
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jul; 32(5):480-486. PubMed ID: 32596944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic dental perception comparisons between 2D- and 3D-simulated dental discrepancies.
    Revilla-León M; Campbell HE; Meyer MJ; Umorin M; Sones A; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):763-773. PubMed ID: 31982145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esthetic smile preferences and the orientation of the maxillary occlusal plane.
    Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Naylor WP; Maveli TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 23217467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Layperson's preference of the transverse occlusal plane in asymmetric facial model.
    Silva BP; Tortora SC; Stanley K; Mahn G; Coachman C; Mahn E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Nov; 31(6):620-626. PubMed ID: 31515911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontists' and laypeople's perception of smile height aesthetics in relation to varying degrees of transverse cant of anterior teeth.
    Shiyan H; Xu Q; Shuhao X; Nanquan R; Xiaobing L
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 27468592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Layperson's perception of axial midline angulation in asymmetric faces.
    Silva BP; Jiménez-Castellanos E; Stanley K; Mahn E; Coachman C; Finkel S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 30(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29171154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Layperson's preference regarding orientation of the transverse occlusal plane and commissure line from the frontal perspective.
    Silva BP; Jiménez-Castellanos E; Finkel S; Macias IR; Chu SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):513-516. PubMed ID: 27881322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of maxillary dental midline shift in asymmetric faces.
    Silva BP; Jiménez-Castellanos E; Martinez-de-Fuentes R; Fernandez AA; Chu S
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(4):588-96. PubMed ID: 26794054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the interproximal contact level on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Rayyan MR
    Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(3):251-255. PubMed ID: 31577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings.
    Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson MR
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Oct; 21(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 10565092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople.
    Acar YB; Abuhan E; Boyacıyan R; Özdemir F
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 34652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence of alterations in the characteristics of smile symmetry in an adult population from southern Europe.
    Jiménez-Castellanos E; Orozco-Varo A; Arroyo-Cruz G; Iglesias-Linares A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 26803179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.