These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34248744)

  • 1. How Do Reference Points Influence the Representation of the N200 for Consumer Preference?
    Wang G; Li J; Zhu C; Wang S; Jiang S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():645775. PubMed ID: 34248744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can Brain Waves Really Tell If a Product Will Be Purchased? Inferring Consumer Preferences From Single-Item Brain Potentials.
    Goto N; Lim XL; Shee D; Hatano A; Khong KW; Buratto LG; Watabe M; Schaefer A
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2019; 13():19. PubMed ID: 31316357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Influence of the Consumer Ethnocentrism and Cultural Familiarity on Brand Preference: Evidence of Event-Related Potential (ERP).
    Ma Q; Abdeljelil HM; Hu L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():220. PubMed ID: 31333433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural signals of selective attention are modulated by subjective preferences and buying decisions in a virtual shopping task.
    Goto N; Mushtaq F; Shee D; Lim XL; Mortazavi M; Watabe M; Schaefer A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Sep; 128():11-20. PubMed ID: 28666891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The implicit preference evaluation for the ceramic tiles with different visual features: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Chen J; He B; Zhu H; Wu J
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1139687. PubMed ID: 37026082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences.
    Connolly JF; Phillips NA; Stewart SH; Brake WG
    Brain Lang; 1992 Jul; 43(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 1643505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Influence of the concrete and abstract graphs on N200 and P300 potentials].
    Li M; Yang G
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 37(3):427-433. PubMed ID: 32597084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.
    Byrne A; Bonfiglio E; Rigby C; Edelstyn N
    Brain Inform; 2022 Nov; 9(1):27. PubMed ID: 36376735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.
    Maxfield ND
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2906-2923. PubMed ID: 28973156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of value reference point and risk preference on adherence in hypertensive patients in a low-income area of China.
    Wang C; Wang P; Dong H; Zhang L; Wu T
    Postgrad Med; 2020 Mar; 132(2):132-140. PubMed ID: 31900018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doubling the Speed of N200 Speller via Dual-Directional Motion Encoding.
    Liu D; Liu C; Chen J; Zhang D; Hong B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jan; 68(1):204-213. PubMed ID: 32746042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-Related Changes in Auditory Nogo-N200 Latency in Medication-Naïve Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Lee YJ; Jeong MY; Park S; Kim JH; Kim JS; Woo SI
    Psychiatry Investig; 2020 Jul; 17(7):702-709. PubMed ID: 32631030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The latency of a visual evoked potential tracks the onset of decision making.
    Nunez MD; Gosai A; Vandekerckhove J; Srinivasan R
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():93-108. PubMed ID: 31028925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of perceived quality on online buying decisions: an event-related potentials perspective.
    Wang J; Han W
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(14):1091-8. PubMed ID: 25037004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased Preference and Value of Consumer Products by Attentional Selection.
    Makarina N; Hübner R; Florack A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2086. PubMed ID: 31607976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of the endogenous N200 latency event-related potential subcomponent in patients with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.
    Howe AS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Jun; 125(6):1145-51. PubMed ID: 24252395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of automatic associations on preference for milk type.
    Harwood WS; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Dec; 103(12):11218-11227. PubMed ID: 33041023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving Patient Preference Elicitation by Applying Concepts From the Consumer Research Field: Narrative Literature Review.
    Ver Donck N; Vander Stichele G; Huys I
    Interact J Med Res; 2020 Mar; 9(1):e13684. PubMed ID: 32229460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinctive Effect of Donepezil Treatment on P300 and N200 Subcomponents of Auditory Event-Related Evoked Potentials in Alzheimer Disease Patients.
    Vaitkevičius A; Kaubrys G; Audronytė E
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 Jul; 21():1920-7. PubMed ID: 26138001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who's in control? Proficiency and L1 influence on L2 processing.
    Elston-Güttler KE; Paulmann S; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1593-610. PubMed ID: 16269099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.