136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34248886)
1. Bayesian Generalized Linear Model for Simulating Bacterial Inactivation/Growth Considering Variability and Uncertainty.
Hiura S; Abe H; Koyama K; Koseki S
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():674364. PubMed ID: 34248886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling Stochastic Variability in the Numbers of Surviving Salmonella enterica, Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes Cells at the Single-Cell Level in a Desiccated Environment.
Koyama K; Hokunan H; Hasegawa M; Kawamura S; Koseki S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transforming kinetic model into a stochastic inactivation model: Statistical evaluation of stochastic inactivation of individual cells in a bacterial population.
Hiura S; Abe H; Koyama K; Koseki S
Food Microbiol; 2020 Oct; 91():103508. PubMed ID: 32539982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel modelling as a tool to include variability and uncertainty in quantitative microbiology and risk assessment. Thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes as proof of concept.
Garre A; Zwietering MH; den Besten HMW
Food Res Int; 2020 Nov; 137():109374. PubMed ID: 33233076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of uncertainty and variability in bacterial growth using Bayesian inference. Application to Listeria monocytogenes.
Pouillot R; Albert I; Cornu M; Denis JB
Int J Food Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 81(2):87-104. PubMed ID: 12457583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The COM-Poisson Process for Stochastic Modeling of Osmotic Inactivation Dynamics of
Polese P; Del Torre M; Stecchini ML
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():681468. PubMed ID: 34305844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative assessment of parameter estimation methods in the presence of overdispersion: a simulation study.
Roosa K; Luo R; Chowell G
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4299-4313. PubMed ID: 31499663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Most Probable Curve method - A robust approach to estimate kinetic models from low plate count data resulting in reduced uncertainty.
Garre A; Zwietering MH; van Boekel MAJS
Int J Food Microbiol; 2022 Nov; 380():109871. PubMed ID: 35985079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Describing the Individual Spore Variability and the Parameter Uncertainty in Bacterial Survival Kinetics Model by Using Second-Order Monte Carlo Simulation.
Abe H; Koyama K; Takeoka K; Doto S; Koseki S
Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():985. PubMed ID: 32508792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stochastic modeling of variability in survival behavior of Bacillus simplex spore population during isothermal inactivation at the single cell level using a Monte Carlo simulation.
Abe H; Koyama K; Kawamura S; Koseki S
Food Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 82():436-444. PubMed ID: 31027803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Describing Uncertainty in
Koyama K; Aspridou Z; Koseki S; Koutsoumanis K
Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():2239. PubMed ID: 31681187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stochastic simulation for death probability of bacterial population considering variability in individual cell inactivation time and initial number of cells.
Koyama K; Abe H; Kawamura S; Koseki S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():125-131. PubMed ID: 30326383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterizing the performance of the Conway-Maxwell Poisson generalized linear model.
Francis RA; Geedipally SR; Guikema SD; Dhavala SS; Lord D; LaRocca S
Risk Anal; 2012 Jan; 32(1):167-83. PubMed ID: 21801191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tail or artefact? Illustration of the impact that uncertainty of the serial dilution and cell enumeration methods has on microbial inactivation.
Garre A; Egea JA; Esnoz A; Palop A; Fernandez PS
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():76-83. PubMed ID: 30884713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of parameter uncertainty for an activated sludge model using Bayesian inference: a comparison with the frequentist method.
Zonta ZJ; Flotats X; Magrí A
Environ Technol; 2014 Aug; 35(13-16):1618-29. PubMed ID: 24956752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calculating stochastic inactivation of individual cells in a bacterial population using variability in individual cell inactivation time and initial cell number.
Koyama K; Abe H; Kawamura S; Koseki S
J Theor Biol; 2019 May; 469():172-179. PubMed ID: 30831174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting industrial-scale cell culture seed trains-A Bayesian framework for model fitting and parameter estimation, dealing with uncertainty in measurements and model parameters, applied to a nonlinear kinetic cell culture model, using an MCMC method.
Hernández Rodríguez T; Posch C; Schmutzhard J; Stettner J; Weihs C; Pörtner R; Frahm B
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2019 Nov; 116(11):2944-2959. PubMed ID: 31347693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harnessing the theoretical foundations of the exponential and beta-Poisson dose-response models to quantify parameter uncertainty using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Schmidt PJ; Pintar KD; Fazil AM; Topp E
Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1677-93. PubMed ID: 23311599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the double Poisson generalized linear model.
Zou Y; Geedipally SR; Lord D
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():497-505. PubMed ID: 23954684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Approaches for dealing with various sources of overdispersion in modeling count data: Scale adjustment versus modeling.
Payne EH; Hardin JW; Egede LE; Ramakrishnan V; Selassie A; Gebregziabher M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1802-1823. PubMed ID: 26031359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
