These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3425149)

  • 1. Classification of cervical smears with discordance between the cytologic and/or histologic ratings.
    Willocx F; de Somer ML; Van Roy J
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 3425149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the quality assessment of cervical smears.
    Klinkhamer PJ; Vooijs GP; de Haan AF
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 2929223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolution of equivocal results with the Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV DNA test: a cytologic/histologic review of 191 cases.
    Knoepp SM; Kuebler DL; Wilbur DC
    Diagn Mol Pathol; 2007 Sep; 16(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 17721319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of the intralaboratory diagnostic variability in the Imola cervical screening program].
    Fabbris E; Bucchi L; Folicaldi S; Amadori A; Ghidoni D; Medri M; Bondi A
    Pathologica; 1998 Apr; 90(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 9619055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: a study of 522 consecutive cervical cones.
    Abdul-Karim FW; Nuñez C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 3966027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women with human immunodeficiency virus infection and abnormal Papanicolaou smears: a prospective study of colposcopy and clinical outcome.
    Adachi A; Fleming I; Burk RD; Ho GY; Klein RS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 8437789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
    Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
    Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials.
    Yoshida T; Fukuda T; Sano T; Kanuma T; Owada N; Nakajima T
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15098254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined cytology and colposcopy to screen for cervical cancer in pregnancy.
    Guerra B; De Simone P; Gabrielli S; Falco P; Montanari G; Bovicelli L
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Aug; 43(8):647-53. PubMed ID: 9749413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endocervical curettage after cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Krebs HB; Wheelock JB
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 4009559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National registry of cervical cytologic diagnoses in The Netherlands.
    Vooijs GP; Casparie-van Velsen IA; Peters FA; Beck HL
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):825-30. PubMed ID: 2588915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control measures for cervical cytology laboratories.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Drake M
    Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 3287817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of the College of American Pathologists' programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Data summary of diagnostic performance in cervical cytopathology.
    Penner DW
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 2750431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The predictive value of immature dysplastic cells in CIN I and II smears.
    Boon ME; Kwikkel HJ; Rietveld W
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1986; 2(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 3720482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardized model for diagnosing cervical carcinoma in situ based on the cytologic signs.
    de Somer ML; Willocx F; Van Roy J
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 3425148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Significance of precise cytodiagnosis in the indication for diagnostic conisation].
    Schrodt U; Wilken H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1975; 97(4):216-9. PubMed ID: 1217247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.