BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34251697)

  • 1. Fitting marginal models in small samples: A simulation study of marginalized multilevel models and generalized estimating equations.
    Bie R; Haneuse S; Huey N; Schildcrout J; McGee G
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(24):5298-5312. PubMed ID: 34251697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small sample GEE estimation of regression parameters for longitudinal data.
    Paul S; Zhang X
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3869-81. PubMed ID: 24797886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A bias-corrected covariance estimate for improved inference with quadratic inference functions.
    Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):4003-22. PubMed ID: 22807168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified robust variance estimator for generalized estimating equations with improved small-sample performance.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1278-91. PubMed ID: 21538453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2779-2792. PubMed ID: 32578264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling sparsely clustered data: design-based, model-based, and single-level methods.
    McNeish DM
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):552-63. PubMed ID: 25110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal combination of estimating equations in the analysis of multilevel nested correlated data.
    Stoner JA; Leroux BG; Puumala M
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(4):464-73. PubMed ID: 19904773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
    Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Biom J; 2017 May; 59(3):478-495. PubMed ID: 28128854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Scott JM; deCamp A; Juraska M; Fay MP; Gilbert PB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):583-597. PubMed ID: 25267551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties and pitfalls of weighting as an alternative to multilevel multiple imputation in cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes under covariate-dependent missingness.
    Turner EL; Yao L; Li F; Prague M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 May; 29(5):1338-1353. PubMed ID: 31293199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of weighted estimating equations for longitudinal binary data with drop-outs missing at random.
    Preisser JS; Lohman KK; Rathouz PJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(20):3035-54. PubMed ID: 12369080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A marginal approach to reduced-rank penalized spline smoothing with application to multilevel functional data.
    Chen H; Wang Y; Paik MC; Choi HA
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2013 Oct; 108(504):1216-1229. PubMed ID: 24497670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of cluster size imbalance and covariates on the estimation performance of quadratic inference functions.
    Westgate PM; Braun TM
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2209-22. PubMed ID: 22415948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of quadratic inference functions for estimating intervention effects in cluster randomized trials.
    Yu H; Li F; Turner EL
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2020 Sep; 19():100605. PubMed ID: 32728648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A bias-reduced generalized estimating equation approach for proportional odds models with small-sample longitudinal ordinal data.
    Tada Y; Sato T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):140. PubMed ID: 38943068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.