130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34251743)
1. Outsourcing robotic-assisted operations to private hospitals: cost analysis of a retrospective cohort.
Young E; Vissapragada R; Bulamu NB; Raju DP; McDonald CR
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Nov; 91(11):2352-2359. PubMed ID: 34251743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.
Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Minimally Invasive Colectomy.
Simianu VV; Gaertner WB; Kuntz K; Kwaan MR; Lowry AC; Madoff RD; Jensen CC
Ann Surg; 2020 Aug; 272(2):334-341. PubMed ID: 32675547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?
Patel MN; Aboumohamed A; Hemal A
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 26123244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative health technology assessment of robotic-assisted, direct manual laparoscopic and open surgery: a prospective study.
Turchetti G; Pierotti F; Palla I; Manetti S; Freschi C; Ferrari V; Cuschieri A
Surg Endosc; 2017 Feb; 31(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 27317030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).
Tsuda S; Oleynikov D; Gould J; Azagury D; Sandler B; Hutter M; Ross S; Haas E; Brody F; Satava R
Surg Endosc; 2015 Oct; 29(10):2873-84. PubMed ID: 26205559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of a robotic surgical program in gynaecological oncology and comparison with prior laparoscopic series.
Povolotskaya N; Woolas R; Brinkmann D
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():814315. PubMed ID: 25785195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes and cost-benefit analysis comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.
Vasudevan V; Reusche R; Wallace H; Kaza S
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5490-5493. PubMed ID: 27126626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.
Gonzalez A; Escobar E; Romero R; Walker G; Mejias J; Gallas M; Dickens E; Johnson CJ; Rabaza J; Kudsi OY
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 27495347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with 10 years of a robotic surgery program at an Academic Medical Center.
Stringfield SB; Parry LA; Eisenstein SG; Horgan SN; Kane CJ; Ramamoorthy SL
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1950-1960. PubMed ID: 33844089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-Effectiveness of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications.
Marino P; Houvenaeghel G; Narducci F; Boyer-Chammard A; Ferron G; Uzan C; Bats AS; Mathevet P; Dessogne P; Guyon F; Rouanet P; Jaffre I; Carcopino X; Perez T; Lambaudie E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1102-8. PubMed ID: 26098092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The MicroHand S robotic-assisted versus Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical resection for patients with sigmoid colon cancer: a single-center retrospective study.
Luo D; Liu Y; Zhu H; Li X; Gao W; Li X; Zhu S; Yu X
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3368-3374. PubMed ID: 31482355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?
Rowe CK; Pierce MW; Tecci KC; Houck CS; Mandell J; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):871-7. PubMed ID: 22283146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Roux en Y gastric bypass can be safe and cost-effective in a rural setting: clinical outcomes from a community hospital bariatric program.
Oviedo RJ; Nayak T; Long Z; Yan M
J Robot Surg; 2021 Dec; 15(6):929-936. PubMed ID: 33507471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
