These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34251801)

  • 21. MDTraj: A Modern Open Library for the Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories.
    McGibbon RT; Beauchamp KA; Harrigan MP; Klein C; Swails JM; Hernández CX; Schwantes CR; Wang LP; Lane TJ; Pande VS
    Biophys J; 2015 Oct; 109(8):1528-32. PubMed ID: 26488642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morphoscanner2.0: A new python module for analysis of molecular dynamics simulations.
    Fontana F; Carlino C; Malik A; Gelain F
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284307. PubMed ID: 37104393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly.
    Aliev AE; Courtier-Murias D
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Sep; 114(38):12358-75. PubMed ID: 20825228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to run molecular dynamics simulations on electrospray droplets and gas phase proteins: Basic guidelines and selected applications.
    Konermann L; Metwally H; McAllister RG; Popa V
    Methods; 2018 Jul; 144():104-112. PubMed ID: 29678588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conformational state-specific free energy differences by one-step perturbation: protein secondary structure preferences of the GROMOS 43A1 and 53A6 force fields.
    Lin Z; Van Gunsteren WF; Liu H
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2290-7. PubMed ID: 21541965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bottled SAFT: A Web App Providing SAFT-γ Mie Force Field Parameters for Thousands of Molecular Fluids.
    Ervik Å; Mejía A; Müller EA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Sep; 56(9):1609-14. PubMed ID: 27556884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Mackerell AD; Feig M; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Aug; 25(11):1400-15. PubMed ID: 15185334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Exploring biomolecular dynamics and interactions using advanced sampling methods.
    Luitz M; Bomblies R; Ostermeir K; Zacharias M
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2015 Aug; 27(32):323101. PubMed ID: 26194626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Full Atom Simulations of Spin Label Conformations.
    Fajer P; Fajer M; Zawrotny M; Yang W
    Methods Enzymol; 2015; 563():623-42. PubMed ID: 26478501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Connecting free energy surfaces in implicit and explicit solvent: an efficient method to compute conformational and solvation free energies.
    Deng N; Zhang BW; Levy RM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2868-78. PubMed ID: 26236174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accurate calculation of conformational free energy differences in explicit water: the confinement-solvation free energy approach.
    Esque J; Cecchini M
    J Phys Chem B; 2015 Apr; 119(16):5194-207. PubMed ID: 25807150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conformational ensembles of RNA oligonucleotides from integrating NMR and molecular simulations.
    Bottaro S; Bussi G; Kennedy SD; Turner DH; Lindorff-Larsen K
    Sci Adv; 2018 May; 4(5):eaar8521. PubMed ID: 29795785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved model of hydrated calcium ion for molecular dynamics simulations using classical biomolecular force fields.
    Yoo J; Wilson J; Aksimentiev A
    Biopolymers; 2016 Oct; 105(10):752-63. PubMed ID: 27144470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How accurately do current force fields predict experimental peptide conformations? An adiabatic free energy dynamics study.
    Tzanov AT; Cuendet MA; Tuckerman ME
    J Phys Chem B; 2014 Jun; 118(24):6539-52. PubMed ID: 24620905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FEPrepare: A Web-Based Tool for Automating the Setup of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Zavitsanou S; Tsengenes A; Papadourakis M; Amendola G; Chatzigoulas A; Dellis D; Cosconati S; Cournia Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4131-4138. PubMed ID: 34519200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coarse-grained force fields for molecular simulations.
    Barnoud J; Monticelli L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1215():125-49. PubMed ID: 25330962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validating Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Experimental Observables in Light of Underlying Conformational Ensembles.
    Childers MC; Daggett V
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Jul; 122(26):6673-6689. PubMed ID: 29864281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of force fields on the conformational and dynamic properties of amyloid β(1-40) dimer explored by replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations.
    Watts CR; Gregory A; Frisbie C; Lovas S
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86(3):279-300. PubMed ID: 29235155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Challenges and Opportunities: A Biologist's Prospective.
    Kumari I; Sandhu P; Ahmed M; Akhter Y
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2017 Aug; 18(11):1163-1179. PubMed ID: 28637405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.