159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34252090)
1. Impact of assumptions on future costs, disutility and mortality in cost-effectiveness analysis; a model exploration.
Omidvari AH; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; de Koning HJ; Meester RGS
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253893. PubMed ID: 34252090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.
Dinh TA; Alperin P; Walter LC; Smith R
J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 22237663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution microendoscopy for esophageal cancer screening in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hur C; Choi SE; Kong CY; Wang GQ; Xu H; Polydorides AD; Xue LY; Perzan KE; Tramontano AC; Richards-Kortum RR; Anandasabapathy S
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(18):5513-23. PubMed ID: 25987774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.
Gini A; Zauber AG; Cenin DR; Omidvari AH; Hempstead SE; Fink AK; Lowenfels AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
Gastroenterology; 2018 Feb; 154(3):556-567.e18. PubMed ID: 29102616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
Phisalprapa P; Supakankunti S; Chaiyakunapruk N
J Med Econ; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 31560247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
Ladabaum U; Mannalithara A; Brill JV; Levin Z; Bundorf KM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Dec; 113(12):1836-1847. PubMed ID: 29904156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of a urine metabolomics test vs. alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies.
Barichello S; Deng L; Ismond KP; Loomes DE; Kirwin EM; Wang H; Chang D; Svenson LW; Thanh NX
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 34(11):1953-1962. PubMed ID: 31673772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness of Current Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
Ladabaum U
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2020 Jul; 30(3):479-497. PubMed ID: 32439083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Iranian High Risk Population.
Javadinasab H; Daroudi R; Salimzadeh H; Delavari A; Vezvaie P; Malekzadeh R
Arch Iran Med; 2017 Sep; 20(9):564-571. PubMed ID: 29048918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Screening for Colorectal Cancer Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History.
Cenin DR; Naber SK; de Weerdt AC; Jenkins MA; Preen DB; Ee HC; O'Leary PC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2020 Jan; 29(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 31748260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Goede SL; Bosch LJW; Melotte V; Carvalho B; van Engeland M; Meijer GA; de Koning HJ; van Ballegooijen M
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):504-512.e11. PubMed ID: 28733262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wide Area Transepithelial Sampling with Computer-Assisted Analysis (WATS
Singer ME; Smith MS
Dig Dis Sci; 2021 May; 66(5):1572-1579. PubMed ID: 32578042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Meester RGS; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Knudsen AB; Ladabaum U
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 171(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 31546257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age at Initiation and Frequency of Screening to Prevent Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in High-risk Regions: an Economic Evaluation.
Wu B; Wang Z; Zhang Q
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Jun; 13(6):543-550. PubMed ID: 32152149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The economic evaluation of screening for colorectal cancer: Case of Iran.
Barouni M; Ghaderi H; Shahmoradi MK
Clin Lab; 2013; 59(5-6):667-74. PubMed ID: 23865368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
