These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3425262)

  • 1. Assessment of an elastic model in the pathogenesis of keratoconus.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Oct; 65(5):545-50. PubMed ID: 3425262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal topography and elasticity in normal and keratoconic eyes. A methodological study concerning the pathogenesis of keratoconus.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol Suppl (1985); 1989; 193():1-36. PubMed ID: 2552742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the keratoconic cornea using computerised corneal mapping and ultrasonic measurements of corneal thickness.
    Owens H; Watters GA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8762772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of corneal volume from anterior topography and topographic pachymetry: application to healthy and keratoconic eyes.
    Cerviño A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Ferrer-Blasco T; Garcia-Resua C; Montes-Mico R; Parafita M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Nov; 29(6):652-60. PubMed ID: 19821928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Corneal tissue mass in normal and keratoconic eyes. In vivo estimation based on area of horizontal optical sections.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Jun; 66(3):305-8. PubMed ID: 10994452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1988 Apr; 66(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 3389085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior corneal curvature and its influence on corneal dioptric power.
    Edmund C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1994 Dec; 72(6):715-20. PubMed ID: 7747582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of central and peripheral corneal thickness with ultrasound biomicroscopy in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Avitabile T; Marano F; Uva MG; Reibaldi A
    Cornea; 1997 Nov; 16(6):639-44. PubMed ID: 9395873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Central and peripheral corneal thickness in keratoconus and normal patient groups.
    Gromacki SJ; Barr JT
    Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jul; 71(7):437-41. PubMed ID: 7970558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differentiating contact lens induced warpage from true keratoconus using corneal topography.
    Lebow KA; Grohe RM
    CLAO J; 1999 Apr; 25(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 10344298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of corneal measurements obtained from a Scheimpflug camera and an integrated Placido-optical coherence tomography device in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 93(6):e488-94. PubMed ID: 25495530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The study of corneal epithelial change in keratoconic eyes with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomographic pachymetry].
    Zhao Y; Hong J; Wang F; Cui X; Yang Y; Zhu X; Wu D; Wei A; Chen Y; Wu S; Huang F; Xu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 50(9):665-70. PubMed ID: 25533557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zhang L; Danesh J; Tannan A; Phan V; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2196-204. PubMed ID: 26703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of softperm lens wear on corneal thickness and topography: a comparison between keratoconic and normal corneae.
    Owens H; Watters G; Gamble G
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 12054377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.