These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34253223)

  • 1. Bone quality and quantity of the mandibular symphyseal region in autogenous bone grafting using cone-beam computed tomography: a cross-sectional study.
    Safi Y; Amid R; Kadkhodazadeh M; Mortazavi H; Sharifi MP; Gandomi S
    Head Face Med; 2021 Jul; 17(1):26. PubMed ID: 34253223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lee JE; Lee YJ; Jin SH; Kim Y; Kook YA; Ko Y; Park JB
    Exp Ther Med; 2015 Dec; 10(6):2150-2156. PubMed ID: 26668608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of intrabony nerve canals in mandibular interforaminal region by using cone-beam computed tomography and a recommendation of safe zone for implant and bone harvesting.
    Yang XW; Zhang FF; Li YH; Wei B; Gong Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 28374431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the frequency of visualization of morphological variations in anatomical bone features in the mandibular interforaminal region through cone-beam computed tomography.
    do Carmo Oliveira M; Tedesco TK; Gimenez T; Allegrini S
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Oct; 40(10):1119-1131. PubMed ID: 29785677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Analysis of Mandibular Symphyseal Graft Sufficiency for Alveolar Cleft Bone Grafting.
    Kilinc A; Saruhan N; Ertas U; Korkmaz IH; Kaymaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):147-150. PubMed ID: 27941546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Gupta A; Rathee S; Agarwal J; Pachar RB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.
    Swasty D; Lee J; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e377-89. PubMed ID: 21435546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual Three-Dimensional Model Analysis in the Assessment of the Maxillary and Mandibular Donor Sites on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images.
    Diarjani SM; Motevasseli S; Dalili Kajan Z
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Oct; 36(5):2249-2258. PubMed ID: 37428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible.
    Al-Ani O; Nambiar P; Ha KO; Ngeow WC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():115-21. PubMed ID: 22233422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Measurement of Alveolar Ridge at Posterior Mandible for Implant Graft Estimation.
    Zhang W; Tullis J; Weltman R
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):e231-7. PubMed ID: 25535890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volumetric analysis of chin and mandibular retromolar region as donor sites for cortico-cancellous bone blocks.
    Zeltner M; Flückiger LB; Hämmerle CH; Hüsler J; Benic GI
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):999-1004. PubMed ID: 26748953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study.
    Srebrzyńska-Witek A; Koszowski R; Różyło-Kalinowska I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Apr; 22(3):1567-1578. PubMed ID: 29063382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human bone repair after mandibular symphysis block harvesting: a clinical and tomographic study.
    Verdugo F; Simonian K; D'Addona A; Pontón J; Nowzari H
    J Periodontol; 2010 May; 81(5):702-9. PubMed ID: 20429649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of mandibular posterior regional landmarks using cone-beam computed tomography in dental implant surgery.
    de Souza LA; Souza Picorelli Assis NM; Ribeiro RA; Pires Carvalho AC; Devito KL
    Ann Anat; 2016 May; 205():53-9. PubMed ID: 26851559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Symphysis in a Normal Occlusion Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Salemi F; Farhadian M; Ebrahimi M
    Maedica (Bucur); 2021 Jun; 16(2):230-238. PubMed ID: 34621345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anatomical topography of the mandibular symphysis in the Korean population: a computed tomography analysis.
    Lee KA; Kim MS; Hong JY; Lee JS; Choi SH; Chai JK; Jung UW
    Clin Anat; 2014 May; 27(4):592-7. PubMed ID: 24343797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of the Prevalence, Length, and Passage of the Anterior Loop of the Mandibular Canal.
    Raju N; Zhang W; Jadhav A; Ioannou A; Eswaran S; Weltman R
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Dec; 45(6):463-468. PubMed ID: 31536439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness as assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Foosiri P; Mahatumarat K; Panmekiate S
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 23(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 29791685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitation of Mandibular Symphysis Bone as Source of Bone Grafting: Description in Class I and Class III Skeletal Conditions.
    Velásquez H; Olate S; Díaz C; Navarro P; Borie E; de Moraes M
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Jun; 43(3):211-217. PubMed ID: 28650795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
    Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.