These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34253598)

  • 1. Citizen monitoring promotes informed and inclusive forest governance in Liberia.
    Christensen D; Hartman AC; Samii C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(29):. PubMed ID: 34253598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of forest management systems on natural resource use and provision of ecosystem services in Tanzania.
    Strauch AM; Rurai MT; Almedom AM
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():35-44. PubMed ID: 27203700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Satellite-based deforestation alerts with training and incentives for patrolling facilitate community monitoring in the Peruvian Amazon.
    Slough T; Kopas J; Urpelainen J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(29):. PubMed ID: 34253599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.
    Brandt JS; Allendorf T; Radeloff V; Brooks J
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1271-1282. PubMed ID: 28295561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning Through New Approaches to Forest Governance: Evidence from Harrop-Procter Community Forest, Canada.
    Egunyu F; Reed MG; Sinclair JA
    Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 57(4):784-97. PubMed ID: 26725053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linking Attitudes, Policy, and Forest Cover Change in Buffer Zone Communities of Chitwan National Park, Nepal.
    Stapp JR; Lilieholm RJ; Leahy J; Upadhaya S
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1292-303. PubMed ID: 26920157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors Limiting Formation of Community Forestry Enterprises in the Southern Mixteca Region of Oaxaca, Mexico.
    Hernández-Aguilar JA; Cortina-Villar HS; García-Barrios LE; Castillo-Santiago MÁ
    Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 59(3):490-504. PubMed ID: 28101587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Governance of forest resource use in western Nepal: Current state and community preferences.
    Bhatta M; Zander KK; Garnett ST
    Ambio; 2022 Jul; 51(7):1711-1725. PubMed ID: 35034330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resource use among rural agricultural households near protected areas in Vietnam: the social costs of conservation and implications for enforcement.
    McElwee PD
    Environ Manage; 2010 Jan; 45(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 19924473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can community monitoring save the commons? Evidence on forest use and displacement.
    Eisenbarth S; Graham L; Rigterink AS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(29):. PubMed ID: 34253600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory.
    Ostrom E; Nagendra H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Dec; 103(51):19224-31. PubMed ID: 17088538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+.
    Holmes I; Potvin C
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1380-93. PubMed ID: 24762062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
    Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lessons from community-based payment for ecosystem service schemes: from forests to rangelands.
    Dougill AJ; Stringer LC; Leventon J; Riddell M; Rueff H; Spracklen DV; Butt E
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Nov; 367(1606):3178-90. PubMed ID: 23045714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating remotely sensed fires for predicting deforestation for REDD.
    Armenteras D; Gibbes C; Anaya JA; Dávalos LM
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1294-1304. PubMed ID: 28208227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government.
    Wright GD; Andersson KP; Gibson CC; Evans TP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Dec; 113(52):14958-14963. PubMed ID: 27956644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada.
    Teitelbaum S
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():257-67. PubMed ID: 24321286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beliefs about the Potential Impacts of Exploiting Non-Timber Forest Products Predict Voluntary Participation in Monitoring.
    Dantas Brites A; Morsello C
    Environ Manage; 2017 Jun; 59(6):898-911. PubMed ID: 28324146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opportunities to enhance contribution of model forests in the sustainable forest resources management (example from Yalova Model Forest).
    Bekiroğlu S; Özdemir M; Özyürek E; Arslan A
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Oct; 181():701-709. PubMed ID: 27566934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of community forestry in Prey Long forest, Cambodia.
    Lambrick FH; Brown ND; Lawrence A; Bebber DP
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 24400672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.