These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34254871)

  • 1. Auscl-D: a mercury-free digital auscultatory sphygmomanometer.
    Kumar V; Kumar R; Kumar M; Wander GS; Sahani A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Nov; 45(8):656-663. PubMed ID: 34254871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
    Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
    J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey to gauge confidence of Indian clinicians on three primary devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Kumar R; Sahani AK; Wander GS
    Blood Press Monit; 2021 Jun; 26(3):196-199. PubMed ID: 33470647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Park SH; Park YS
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of Missouri aneroid sphygmomanometer to measure blood pressure in patients with cancer.
    Ferreira KA; Santos AC; Arthur TC; Santos DA; Pereira D; Freitas EO; Fukuda FM; Baia WR
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 95(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 20658091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
    Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
    Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers.
    Waugh JJ; Gupta M; Rushbrook J; Halligan A; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):309-12. PubMed ID: 12488650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement of Oscillometric and Auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods: An ambulance noise simulation study.
    Tatliparmak AC; Yilmaz S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2023 May; 67():120-125. PubMed ID: 36870252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
    Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
    J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.