These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34255093)

  • 41. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population.
    Prasad M; Reddy KP; Talapaneni AK; Chaitanya N; Bhaskar Reddy MV; Patil R
    J Nat Sci Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 4(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 24082742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of orthodontic treatment with premolar extractions on occlusal planes: A retrospective study.
    Zhu Y; Xiong X; Yang W; Wu Y; Liu J; Ye C; Zhang Q; Han SLR; Wang J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):356-363. PubMed ID: 36300831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Effects of Occlusal Plane Inclination and Dental Decompensation on the Overall Result of Surgical Correction of Class II Malocclusion.
    Seker ED; Sunal Akturk E; Yerli B; Coban G; Kucukkeles N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 33(7):2109-2113. PubMed ID: 35261361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies: a preliminary regression study.
    Ferrario VF; Serrao G; Ciusa V; Morini M; Sforza C
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 12518952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.
    Bishara SE; Fahl JA; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Aug; 84(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 6576637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Analysis of facial features and prediction of lip position in skeletal class III malocclusion adult patients undergoing surgical-orthodontic treatment.
    Lu W; Song G; Sun Q; Peng L; Zhang Y; Wei Y; Han B; Lin J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5227-5238. PubMed ID: 33590299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Anteroposterior skeletofacial classification and its relationship to maxillary second molar buccopalatal angulation.
    Levine TP; Matthews GJ; Salama LA; Yee A
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Nov; 90(6):851-856. PubMed ID: 33378513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability.
    Qamaruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Umer M; Amin E
    Saudi Dent J; 2018 Jan; 30(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 30166870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of functional versus bisected occlusal planes on the Wits appraisal.
    Thayer TA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 May; 97(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 2333856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. ROC surface assessment of the ANB angle and Wits appraisal's diagnostic performance with a statistically derived 'gold standard': does normalizing measurements have any merit?
    Wellens HLL; BeGole EA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):358-364. PubMed ID: 28200074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Association between craniofacial patterns and third molar agenesis in orthodontic patients.
    Paddenberg E; Silva-Souza AC; Blancato AB; Lepri CP; Proff P; Küchler EC; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Aug; 85(Suppl 2):120-126. PubMed ID: 37378838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.
    Kochel J; Meyer-Marcotty P; Witt E; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Apr; 73(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 22391786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Predictability and Reliability of Different Anterio-Posterior Skeletal Discrepancy Indicators in Different Age Groups - A Cephalometric Study.
    Tiwari R; Shyagali TR; Gupta A; Joshi R; Tiwari A; Sen P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):ZC80-ZC84. PubMed ID: 27790586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.