177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34255869)
1. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO
Tarek E; Mostafa WZ; Allam RSHM; El-Samanoudy SI; Saadi DG
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Feb; 54(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 34255869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores.
Eldeeb F; Wahid RM; Alakad R
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 20(12):3917-3923. PubMed ID: 34169628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Split-face comparison of long-pulse-duration neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064-nm laser alone and combination long-pulse and Q-switched Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser with carbon photoenhancer lotion for the treatment of enlarged pores in Asian women.
Wattanakrai P; Rojhirunsakool S; Pootongkam S
Dermatol Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1672-80. PubMed ID: 20961349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Q-Switched 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for post acne scarring: A split-face comparative study.
Sabry HH; Hegazy MS; Ahmed E; Salem RM
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 Sep; 38(5):465-470. PubMed ID: 35020221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and fractional carbon dioxide laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians.
Vachiramon V; Panmanee W; Techapichetvanich T; Chanprapaph K
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 27096729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the efficacy of pulsed dye laser, Q-Switched Nd-YAG, CO2, and combined CO
Radmanesh M; Ghanatir F; Radmanesh R
J Dermatolog Treat; 2021 Mar; 32(2):258-260. PubMed ID: 31415215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining Low Power Fractional CO
Esmat S; Z Elramly A; Shahin D; Hilal RF
Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Dec; 53(10):1325-1340. PubMed ID: 34164829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Fractional CO
Tawfic SO; El-Tawdy A; Shalaby S; Foad A; Shaker O; Sayed SS; Metwally D
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Dec; 52(10):959-965. PubMed ID: 32293045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-power fractional CO₂ laser versus low-fluence Q-switch 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of melasma: a randomized, controlled, split-face study.
Jalaly NY; Valizadeh N; Barikbin B; Yousefi M
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 15(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 24858737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal.
Radmanesh M; Rafiei Z
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015 Apr; 17(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 25411720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians.
Yim S; Lee YH; Choi YJ; Kim WS
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31734761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Comparative study between the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm), and both types in treatment of keratosis pilaris".
Sobhi RM; Adawy NAH; Zaky IS
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 35(6):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 31927647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain.
Al-Dhalimi MA; Al-Janabi MH
Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Nov; 48(9):852-858. PubMed ID: 27669109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A split-face, evaluator-blind randomized study on the early effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser versus Er:YAG micropeel in light solar lentigines in Asians.
Jun HJ; Kim SM; Choi WJ; Cho SH; Lee JD; Kim HS
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2014 Apr; 16(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 24409833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of enlarged pores with the quasi long-pulsed versus Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers: A split-face, comparative, controlled study.
Roh M; Goo B; Jung J; Chung H; Chung K
Laser Ther; 2011; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 24155526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores.
Wang Y; Zheng Y; Cai S
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 37(8):3279-3284. PubMed ID: 35971017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of melasma with mixed parameters of 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser toning and an enhanced effect of ultrasonic application of vitamin C: a split-face study.
Lee MC; Chang CS; Huang YL; Chang SL; Chang CH; Lin YF; Hu S
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 30(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 25073866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of Q-switched and quasi long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, non-ablative 1450-nm diode laser, and ablative 10 600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser for enlarged pores.
Cho SB; Noh S; Lee SJ; Kang JM; Kim YK; Lee JH
J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Jul; 21(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 20509817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractional CO
Hammoda TM; Ahmed NA; Hamdino M
Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Aug; 38(1):187. PubMed ID: 37592125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A split face study to document the safety and efficacy of clearance of melasma with a 5 ns q switched Nd YAG laser versus a 50 ns q switched Nd YAG laser.
Alsaad SM; Ross EV; Mishra V; Miller L
Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Dec; 46(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25411141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
