These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34255869)

  • 1. Short-pulsed and Q-switched ND-YAG laser with topical carbon versus fractional CO
    Tarek E; Mostafa WZ; Allam RSHM; El-Samanoudy SI; Saadi DG
    Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Feb; 54(2):237-244. PubMed ID: 34255869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus carbon-assisted Q-switched Nd: YAG laser in the treatment of dilated facial pores.
    Eldeeb F; Wahid RM; Alakad R
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 20(12):3917-3923. PubMed ID: 34169628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Split-face comparison of long-pulse-duration neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1,064-nm laser alone and combination long-pulse and Q-switched Nd:YAG 1,064-nm laser with carbon photoenhancer lotion for the treatment of enlarged pores in Asian women.
    Wattanakrai P; Rojhirunsakool S; Pootongkam S
    Dermatol Surg; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1672-80. PubMed ID: 20961349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Q-Switched 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for post acne scarring: A split-face comparative study.
    Sabry HH; Hegazy MS; Ahmed E; Salem RM
    Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed; 2022 Sep; 38(5):465-470. PubMed ID: 35020221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and fractional carbon dioxide laser for the treatment of solar lentigines in Asians.
    Vachiramon V; Panmanee W; Techapichetvanich T; Chanprapaph K
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Apr; 48(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 27096729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing the efficacy of pulsed dye laser, Q-Switched Nd-YAG, CO2, and combined CO
    Radmanesh M; Ghanatir F; Radmanesh R
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2021 Mar; 32(2):258-260. PubMed ID: 31415215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining Low Power Fractional CO
    Esmat S; Z Elramly A; Shahin D; Hilal RF
    Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Dec; 53(10):1325-1340. PubMed ID: 34164829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Fractional CO
    Tawfic SO; El-Tawdy A; Shalaby S; Foad A; Shaker O; Sayed SS; Metwally D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Dec; 52(10):959-965. PubMed ID: 32293045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-power fractional CO₂ laser versus low-fluence Q-switch 1,064 nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of melasma: a randomized, controlled, split-face study.
    Jalaly NY; Valizadeh N; Barikbin B; Yousefi M
    Am J Clin Dermatol; 2014 Aug; 15(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 24858737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of CO2 and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers is more effective than Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone for eyebrow tattoo removal.
    Radmanesh M; Rafiei Z
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2015 Apr; 17(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 25411720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians.
    Yim S; Lee YH; Choi YJ; Kim WS
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31734761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Comparative study between the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser, Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm), and both types in treatment of keratosis pilaris".
    Sobhi RM; Adawy NAH; Zaky IS
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 35(6):1367-1376. PubMed ID: 31927647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Split lesion randomized comparative study between long pulsed Nd:YAG laser 532 and 1,064 nm in treatment of facial port-wine stain.
    Al-Dhalimi MA; Al-Janabi MH
    Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Nov; 48(9):852-858. PubMed ID: 27669109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A split-face, evaluator-blind randomized study on the early effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser versus Er:YAG micropeel in light solar lentigines in Asians.
    Jun HJ; Kim SM; Choi WJ; Cho SH; Lee JD; Kim HS
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2014 Apr; 16(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 24409833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of enlarged pores with the quasi long-pulsed versus Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG lasers: A split-face, comparative, controlled study.
    Roh M; Goo B; Jung J; Chung H; Chung K
    Laser Ther; 2011; 20(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 24155526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores.
    Wang Y; Zheng Y; Cai S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Oct; 37(8):3279-3284. PubMed ID: 35971017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of melasma with mixed parameters of 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser toning and an enhanced effect of ultrasonic application of vitamin C: a split-face study.
    Lee MC; Chang CS; Huang YL; Chang SL; Chang CH; Lin YF; Hu S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 30(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 25073866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combination of Q-switched and quasi long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, non-ablative 1450-nm diode laser, and ablative 10 600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser for enlarged pores.
    Cho SB; Noh S; Lee SJ; Kang JM; Kim YK; Lee JH
    J Dermatolog Treat; 2010 Jul; 21(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 20509817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractional CO
    Hammoda TM; Ahmed NA; Hamdino M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Aug; 38(1):187. PubMed ID: 37592125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A split face study to document the safety and efficacy of clearance of melasma with a 5 ns q switched Nd YAG laser versus a 50 ns q switched Nd YAG laser.
    Alsaad SM; Ross EV; Mishra V; Miller L
    Lasers Surg Med; 2014 Dec; 46(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25411141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.