These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34256006)

  • 1. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures.
    Plyler PN; Hausladen J; Capps M; Cox MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3317-3329. PubMed ID: 34256006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; DeVries S; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.
    Koch X; Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A; Janse E
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():186. PubMed ID: 26952145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 33157559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Environment Classification Among Premium Hearing Instruments.
    Yellamsetty A; Ozmeral EJ; Budinsky RA; Eddins DA
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216520980968. PubMed ID: 33749410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting Individual Hearing-Aid Preference From Self-Reported Listening Experiences in Daily Life.
    Christensen JH; Rumley J; Gil-Carvajal JC; Whiston H; Lough M; Saunders GH
    Ear Hear; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38783420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of speech recognition performance with and without a face mask between a basic and a premium hearing aid in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Seol HY; Jo M; Yun H; Park JG; Byun HM; Moon IJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(5):103929. PubMed ID: 37245326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three New Outcome Measures That Tap Into Cognitive Processes Required for Real-Life Communication.
    Lunner T; Alickovic E; Graversen C; Ng EHN; Wendt D; Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):39S-47S. PubMed ID: 33105258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's in a name? A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of non-medical amplification devices in adults with mild and moderate hearing losses.
    Maidment DW; Nakano K; Bennett RJ; Goodwin MV; Ferguson MA
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Feb; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 38421265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Real-World Benefits of Hearing Aids With Deep Neural Network-Based Noise Reduction: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
    Christensen JH; Whiston H; Lough M; Gil-Carvajal JC; Rumley J; Saunders GH
    Am J Audiol; 2024 Feb; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 38354098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-in-Noise Testing: An Introduction for Audiologists.
    Billings CJ; Olsen TM; Charney L; Madsen BM; Holmes CE
    Semin Hear; 2024 Feb; 45(1):55-82. PubMed ID: 38370518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Application of the Medical Research Council's Guidelines for Evaluating Complex Interventions: A Usability Study Assessing Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Maidment DW; Ferguson M
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 27(3S):474-481. PubMed ID: 30452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communicating with Assistive Listening Devices and Age-Related Hearing Loss: Perceptions of Older Australians.
    Aberdeen L; Fereiro D
    Contemp Nurse; 2014 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 24484316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) Survey Results Demonstrate High Satisfaction with and Benefits from Hearing Aids.
    Picou EM
    Semin Hear; 2020 Feb; 41(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 32047346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Premium for an Essay on Physiology, or Medical Chemistry.
    West J Med Surg; 1850 Jul; 6(1):86-87. PubMed ID: 38209697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level on New Hearing Aid Users.
    Hausladen J; Plyler PN; Clausen B; Fincher A; Norris S; Russell T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 34670289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focusing on Positive Listening Experiences Improves Speech Intelligibility in Experienced Hearing Aid Users.
    Lelic D; Nielsen LLA; Pedersen AK; Neher T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241246616. PubMed ID: 38656770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Houmøller SS; Wolff A; Tsai LT; Narayanan SK; Hougaard DD; Gaihede ML; Neher T; Godballe C; Schmidt JH
    Front Aging; 2023; 4():1158272. PubMed ID: 37342862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory environment diversity quantified using entropy from real-world hearing aid data.
    Jorgensen E; Xu J; Chipara O; Wu YH
    Front Digit Health; 2023; 5():1141917. PubMed ID: 37090064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.