These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34256138)
1. Frontotemporal activation differs between perception of simulated cochlear implant speech and speech in background noise: An image-based fNIRS study. Defenderfer J; Forbes S; Wijeakumar S; Hedrick M; Plyler P; Buss AT Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118385. PubMed ID: 34256138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating the role of temporal lobe activation in speech perception accuracy with normal hearing adults: An event-related fNIRS study. Defenderfer J; Kerr-German A; Hedrick M; Buss AT Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():31-41. PubMed ID: 28888891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical correlates of speech intelligibility measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Lawrence RJ; Wiggins IM; Anderson CA; Davies-Thompson J; Hartley DEH Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():53-64. PubMed ID: 30292959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Lawrence RJ; Wiggins IM; Hodgson JC; Hartley DEH Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 401():108155. PubMed ID: 33360183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating Cortical Responses to Noise-Vocoded Speech in Children with Normal Hearing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Mushtaq F; Wiggins IM; Kitterick PT; Anderson CA; Hartley DEH J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):703-717. PubMed ID: 34581879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. Wijayasiri P; Hartley DEH; Wiggins IM Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():55-67. PubMed ID: 28571617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise. Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cortical Speech Processing in Postlingually Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Users, as Revealed by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Zhou X; Seghouane AK; Shah A; Innes-Brown H; Cross W; Litovsky R; McKay CM Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518786850. PubMed ID: 30022732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load. Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing. Chen F; Loizou PC Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inferior frontal gyrus activation predicts individual differences in perceptual learning of cochlear-implant simulations. Eisner F; McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Rosen S; Scott SK J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(21):7179-86. PubMed ID: 20505085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical mechanisms of across-ear speech integration investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Sobczak GG; Zhou X; Moore LE; Bolt DM; Litovsky RY PLoS One; 2024; 19(9):e0307158. PubMed ID: 39292701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions. Tobey EA; Shin S; Sundarrajan M; Geers AE Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21307815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic simulation of cochlear implant hearing: Effect of manipulating various acoustic parameters on intelligibility of speech. Jain S; Vipin Ghosh PG Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jan; 19(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29032744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation. Başkent D J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. Zeng FG; Liu S J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing. Arehart KH; Croghan NB; Muralimanohar RK Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]