These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34256535)

  • 1. The effect of load based on body mass percentage on peak power output in the hang power clean, hang high pull, and mid-thigh clean pull.
    Lopes Dos Santos M; Berton R; Jagodinsky AE; Torry MR; Lagally KM
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2022 Apr; 62(4):457-466. PubMed ID: 34256535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can the Velocity of a 1RM Hang Power Clean Be Used to Estimate a 1RM Hang High Pull?
    Suchomel TJ; Techmanski BS; Kissick CR; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jul; 38(7):1321-1325. PubMed ID: 38900178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Power Output Between the Hang Power Clean and Hang High Pull Across a Wide Range of Loads in Weightlifters.
    Takei S; Hirayama K; Okada J
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(Suppl 1):S84-S88. PubMed ID: 32149888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of various loads on the force-time characteristics of the hang high pull.
    Suchomel TJ; Beckham GK; Wright GA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2015 May; 29(5):1295-301. PubMed ID: 25426514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of load and sex on kinematic and kinetic variables during the mid-thigh clean pull.
    Comfort P; Jones PA; Udall R
    Sports Biomech; 2015 Jun; 14(2):139-56. PubMed ID: 25896197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetic comparison of the power development between power clean variations.
    Suchomel TJ; Wright GA; Kernozek TW; Kline DE
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Feb; 28(2):350-60. PubMed ID: 23689341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Load Absorption Force-Time Characteristics Following the Second Pull of Weightlifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Lake JP; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2017 Jun; 31(6):1644-1652. PubMed ID: 28538316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical Demands of the Hang Power Clean and Jump Shrug: A Joint-Level Perspective.
    Kipp K; Malloy PJ; Smith JC; Giordanelli MD; Kiely MT; Geiser CF; Suchomel TJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Feb; 32(2):466-474. PubMed ID: 27669182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.
    Suchomel TJ; Comfort P; Stone MH
    Sports Med; 2015 Jun; 45(6):823-39. PubMed ID: 25689955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power-Time Curve Comparison between Weightlifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Sole CJ
    J Sports Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 16(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28912659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Redistributing load using wearable resistance during power clean training improves athletic performance.
    Marriner CR; Cronin JB; Macadam P; Storey A
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Oct; 17(9):1101-1109. PubMed ID: 28792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal loading for peak power output during the hang power clean in professional rugby players.
    Kilduff LP; Bevan H; Owen N; Kingsley MI; Bunce P; Bennett M; Cunningham D
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2007 Sep; 2(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19168926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical power production assessment during weightlifting exercises. A systematic review.
    Soriano MA; Kipp K; Lake JP; Suchomel TJ; Marín PJ; Sainz De Baranda MP; Comfort P
    Sports Biomech; 2023 May; 22(5):633-659. PubMed ID: 32336212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables During the Pull From the Knee and Hang Pull, Across Loads.
    Meechan D; McMahon JJ; Suchomel TJ; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1819-1829. PubMed ID: 32282627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Force-Time-Curve Comparison Between Weight-Lifting Derivatives.
    Suchomel TJ; Sole CJ
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2017 Apr; 12(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 27400372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different relative intensities on power output during the hang power clean: identification of the optimal load.
    Kawamori N; Crum AJ; Blumert PA; Kulik JR; Childers JT; Wood JA; Stone MH; Haff GG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2005 Aug; 19(3):698-708. PubMed ID: 16095428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Expertise on Muscle Activity during the Hang Power Clean and Hang Power Snatch Compared to Snatch and Clean Pulls - An Explorative Analysis.
    Geisler S; Havers T; Isenmann E; Schulze J; Lourens LK; Nowak J; Held S; Haff GG
    J Sports Sci Med; 2023 Dec; 22(4):778-789. PubMed ID: 38045750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training With Weightlifting Derivatives: The Effects of Force and Velocity Overload Stimuli.
    Suchomel TJ; McKeever SM; Comfort P
    J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Jul; 34(7):1808-1818. PubMed ID: 32398635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Jump Shrug Height and Landing Forces Across Various Loads.
    Suchomel TJ; Taber CB; Wright GA
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 Jan; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 25932750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biomechanical comparison of successful and unsuccessful power clean attempts.
    Kipp K; Meinerz C
    Sports Biomech; 2017 Jun; 16(2):272-282. PubMed ID: 28372537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.