185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34257181)
21. Musculomandibular morphology in individuals with different vertical skeletal growth patterns: an MRI and cone beam computed tomography study.
Gardovska K; Urtane I; Krumina G
Stomatologija; 2020; 22(4):99-106. PubMed ID: 33847281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the relationship between stylohyoid complex morphology and maxillary/mandibular position using cone beam computed tomography.
Yılmaz D; Orhan K; Cesur E
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2020; 79(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 30973636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. CBCT Analysis of Changes in Dental Occlusion and Temporomandibular Joints before and after MEAW Orthotherapy in Patients with Nonlow Angle of Skeletal Class III.
Guo Y; Qiao X; Yao S; Li T; Jiang N; Peng C
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7238263. PubMed ID: 32149128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method.
Dong Q; Shi H; Jia Q; Tian Y; Zhi K; Zhang L
Scanning; 2021; 2021():9996857. PubMed ID: 34040691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Lemes CR; Tozzi CF; Gribel S; Gribel BF; Venezian GC; do Carmo Menezes C; Custodio W
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Feb; 43(2):267-274. PubMed ID: 32965519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of morphological and morphometric characteristics of the temporomandibular joint in children with different skeletal models in the sagittal and vertical direction.
Sırlı Yılmazturk S; Bozdemir E; Orhan K; Orhan H
Oral Radiol; 2024 Apr; 40(2):178-187. PubMed ID: 38010496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Noh KJ; Baik HS; Han SS; Jang W; Choi YJ
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 33678628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
Kaur A; Natt AS; Mehra SK; Maheshwari K; Singh G; Kaur A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Associations between the 3D position of the mental foramen with sagittal skeletal relationships (classes I, II, and III) and vertical facial growth patterns (normal, long, and short faces) in different ages and sexes: a retrospective cohort study of 360 CBCTs.
Bagheri S; Shokuhifar M; Moradinejad M; Razavi M; Hashemi Ashtiani A; Baratvand B; Rakhshan V
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):968. PubMed ID: 38053168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern.
Nair R; Deguchi TS; Li X; Katashiba S; Chan YH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19154269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study.
Chen Y; Li L; Li Y; Luo N; Dai H; Zhou J
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 36750919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern.
Park IY; Kim JH; Park YH
Korean J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 45(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 25798412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dimensional and Positional Associations between the Mandibular Condyle and Glenoid Fossa: A Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Study.
Almashraqi AA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 33686026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional evaluation of the mandibular condyle in adults with various skeletal patterns.
Mohsen AM; Ye J; Al-Nasri A; Chu C; Zhang WB;
Korean J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 53(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 36806192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Linear and Volumetric Mandibular Asymmetries in Adult Patients With Different Skeletal Classes and Vertical Patterns: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Mendoza LV; Bellot-Arcís C; Montiel-Company JM; García-Sanz V; Almerich-Silla JM; Paredes-Gallardo V
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12319. PubMed ID: 30120301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns - a cross-sectional study.
Santander P; Quast A; Olbrisch C; Rose M; Moser N; Schliephake H; Meyer-Marcotty P
Head Face Med; 2020 Nov; 16(1):33. PubMed ID: 33256789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating mandibular symphysis bone density according to various skeletal patterns with CBCT.
Gousman J; Park JH; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 32599658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dimension and Location of the Mandibular Lingula: Comparisons of Gender and Skeletal Patterns Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Hsu KJ; Tseng YC; Liang SW; Hsiao SY; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2571534. PubMed ID: 32149093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography.
Deguchi T; Katashiba S; Inami T; Foong KW; Huak CY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 20152678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Association between condylar position and vertical skeletal craniofacial morphology: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Paknahad M; Shahidi S
Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):740-751. PubMed ID: 29111131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
