BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34259039)

  • 1. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
    Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
    Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of supplemental three-dimensional breast ultrasound in the work-up of BI-RADS 0 screening recalls.
    den Dekker BM; Broeders MJM; Meeuwis C; Setz-Pels W; Venmans A; van Gils CH; Pijnappel RM
    Insights Imaging; 2024 May; 15(1):131. PubMed ID: 38816526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Automated Breast Ultrasound and Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts.
    Philadelpho F; Calas MJG; Carneiro GAC; Silveira IC; Vaz ABR; Nogueira AMC; Bergmann A; Lopes FPPL
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 43(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 33860502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
    Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
    Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
    Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
    Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
    van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
    Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
    Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.
    Barr RG; Zhang Z; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB; Berg WA
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):701-12. PubMed ID: 23962417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
    Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort].
    Prosch H; Halbwachs C; Strobl C; Reisner LM; Hondl M; Weber M; Mostbeck GH
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21630181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of Supplemental Imaging Modalities for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: Findings From an Umbrella Review and Primary Studies Analysis.
    Lobig F; Caleyachetty A; Forrester L; Morris E; Newstead G; Harris J; Blankenburg M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2023 Jul; 23(5):478-490. PubMed ID: 37202338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.