These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34260141)

  • 1. Using ensemble of ensemble machine learning methods to predict outcomes of cardiac resynchronization.
    Cai C; Tafti AP; Ngufor C; Zhang P; Xiao P; Dai M; Liu H; Noseworthy P; Chen M; Friedman PA; Cha YM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2021 Sep; 32(9):2504-2514. PubMed ID: 34260141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Machine-Learning for Prediction of the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The SMART-AV Study.
    Howell SJ; Stivland T; Stein K; Ellenbogen KA; Tereshchenko LG
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Dec; 7(12):1505-1515. PubMed ID: 34454883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance of Systematic Right Ventricular Assessment in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Candidates: A Machine Learning Approach.
    Galli E; Le Rolle V; Smiseth OA; Duchenne J; Aalen JM; Larsen CK; Sade EA; Hubert A; Anilkumar S; Penicka M; Linde C; Leclercq C; Hernandez A; Voigt JU; Donal E
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2021 May; 34(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 33422667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines.
    Feeny AK; Rickard J; Patel D; Toro S; Trulock KM; Park CJ; LaBarbera MA; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Sinha S; Gorodeski EZ; Grimm RA; Ji X; Barnard J; Madabhushi A; Spragg DD; Chung MK
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 12(7):e007316. PubMed ID: 31216884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of response after cardiac resynchronization therapy with machine learning.
    Liang Y; Ding R; Wang J; Gong X; Yu Z; Pan L; Huang J; Li R; Su Y; Zhu S; Ge J
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 344():120-126. PubMed ID: 34592246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.
    Feeny AK; Rickard J; Trulock KM; Patel D; Toro S; Moennich LA; Varma N; Niebauer MJ; Gorodeski EZ; Grimm RA; Barnard J; Madabhushi A; Chung MK
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e008210. PubMed ID: 32538136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning-based mortality prediction of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score.
    Tokodi M; Schwertner WR; Kovács A; Tősér Z; Staub L; Sárkány A; Lakatos BK; Behon A; Boros AM; Perge P; Kutyifa V; Széplaki G; Gellér L; Merkely B; Kosztin A
    Eur Heart J; 2020 May; 41(18):1747-1756. PubMed ID: 31923316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning-based phenogrouping in heart failure to identify responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Cikes M; Sanchez-Martinez S; Claggett B; Duchateau N; Piella G; Butakoff C; Pouleur AC; Knappe D; Biering-Sørensen T; Kutyifa V; Moss A; Stein K; Solomon SD; Bijnens B
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2019 Jan; 21(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 30328654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using a multi-feature learning method.
    Gallard A; Hubert A; Smiseth O; Voigt JU; Le Rolle V; Leclercq C; Bidaut A; Galli E; Donal E; Hernandez AI
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Mar; 37(3):989-998. PubMed ID: 33226549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretable machine learning predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy responses from personalized biochemical and biomechanical features.
    Haque A; Stubbs D; Hubig NC; Spinale FG; Richardson WJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Oct; 22(1):282. PubMed ID: 36316772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive plasma metabolites profiling reveals phosphatidylcholine species as potential predictors for cardiac resynchronization therapy response.
    Yang S; Hu Y; Zhao J; Jing R; Wang J; Gu M; Niu H; Chen L; Hua W
    ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Feb; 8(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 33211407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Machine learning of ECG waveforms and cardiac magnetic resonance for response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bivona DJ; Ghadimi S; Wang Y; Oomen PJA; Malhotra R; Darby A; Mangrum JM; Mason PK; Mazimba S; Patel AR; Epstein FH; Bilchick KC
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Aug; 178():108627. PubMed ID: 38850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ventricular geometry-regularized QRSd predicts cardiac resynchronization therapy response: machine learning from crosstalk between electrocardiography and echocardiography.
    Lei J; Wang YG; Bhatta L; Ahmed J; Fan D; Wang J; Liu K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 35(7):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 31104177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Timing of cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients and its association with outcomes.
    Goldstein SA; Mentz RJ; Hellkamp AS; Randolph TC; Fonarow GC; Hernandez A; Yancy CW; Al-Khatib SM
    Clin Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 42(2):256-263. PubMed ID: 30548280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of mechanical dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Risum N
    Dan Med J; 2014 Dec; 61(12):B4981. PubMed ID: 25441737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of a risk score for prediction of the long-term benefit of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Barra S; Looi KL; Gajendragadkar PR; Khan FZ; Virdee M; Agarwal S
    Europace; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1187-93. PubMed ID: 26566940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A machine learning method integrating ECG and gated SPECT for cardiac resynchronization therapy decision support.
    de A Fernandes F; Larsen K; He Z; Nascimento E; Peix A; Sha Q; Paez D; Garcia EV; Zhou W; Mesquita CT
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Aug; 50(10):3022-3033. PubMed ID: 37195444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cost of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characterizing heart failure events following cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Varma N; Auricchio A; Connolly AT; Boehmer J; Bahu M; Costanzo MR; Leonelli F; Yoo D; Singh J; Nabutovsky Y; Gold M
    Europace; 2021 Oct; 23(10):1586-1595. PubMed ID: 34198334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of long-term outcomes greater than 10 years after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation.
    Patel D; Trulock KM; Moennich LA; Kiehl EL; Kumar A; Toro S; Donnellan E; Grimaldi A; Baranowski B; Hussein AA; Tarakji KG; Cantillon DJ; Niebauer M; Wazni OM; Varma N; Wilkoff BL; Rickard JW
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 May; 31(5):1182-1186. PubMed ID: 32108406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with improvement in clinical outcomes in Indian heart failure patients: Results of a large, long-term observational study.
    Naik A; Singh B; Yadav R; Pandurangi U; Kler TS; Shankar B; Radhakrishnan R; Rajan V; Bhatia V; Kaul U; Varma J; Dora S; Narasimhan C
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Dec; 70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S377-S383. PubMed ID: 30595293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.