These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34260434)

  • 1. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended high-frequency hearing and head orientation cues benefit children during speech-in-speech recognition.
    Flaherty M; Libert K; Monson BB
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108230. PubMed ID: 33951577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Release From Masking in Children: Effects of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Corbin NE; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):223-235. PubMed ID: 27787392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Band importance for speech-in-speech recognition in the presence of extended high-frequency cues.
    Ananthanarayana RM; Buss E; Monson BB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Aug; 156(2):1202-1213. PubMed ID: 39158325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
    Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Calandruccio L; Oleson J; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 32881723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Poissant SF; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):887-904. PubMed ID: 30418282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):927-937. PubMed ID: 30334835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extended High Frequencies Provide Both Spectral and Temporal Information to Improve Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Trine A; Monson BB
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520980299. PubMed ID: 33345755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tonal Language Speakers Are Better Able to Segregate Competing Speech According to Talker Sex Differences.
    Zhang J; Wang X; Wang NY; Fu X; Gan T; Galvin JJ; Willis S; Xu K; Thomas M; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2801-2810. PubMed ID: 32692939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.
    Leibold LJ; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):935-945. PubMed ID: 29369288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM; Browning J; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.
    Levy SC; Freed DJ; Nilsson M; Moore BC; Puria S
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e214-24. PubMed ID: 25856543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Target and Masker Fundamental Frequency Contour Depth on School-Age Children's Speech Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Libert K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):400-414. PubMed ID: 36580582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maturation of Speech-in-Speech Recognition for Whispered and Voiced Speech.
    Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3117-3128. PubMed ID: 35868232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial Release from Masking Using Clinical Corpora: Sentence Recognition in a Colocated or Spatially Separated Speech Masker.
    King G; Corbin NE; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):271-276. PubMed ID: 31589139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.