These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34260436)

  • 1. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
    Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Captioning Errors, Background Noise, and Hearing Loss on Memory for Text-Captioned Speech.
    Crandell HA; Silcox JW; Ferguson SH; Lohani M; Payne BR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jun; 65(6):2364-2390. PubMed ID: 35623337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.
    Freyman RL; Terpening J; Costanzi AC; Helfer KS
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 28650352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity on Context Use and Reliance on Context in Older Adults.
    Shen J; Sun J; Zhang Z; Sun B; Li H; Liu Y
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):787-800. PubMed ID: 38273447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Influence of Noise Type and Semantic Predictability on Word Recall in Older Listeners and Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    Carter BL; Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Sep; 65(9):3548-3565. PubMed ID: 35973100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Age, Background Noise, Semantic Ambiguity, and Hearing Loss on Recognition Memory for Spoken Sentences.
    Koeritzer MA; Rogers CS; Van Engen KJ; Peelle JE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):740-751. PubMed ID: 29450493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling of the Effect of Cognitive Functioning on Speech Identification.
    Marsja E; Stenbäck V; Moradi S; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1437-1446. PubMed ID: 34983896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Background Noise on Immediate Free Recall of Words in Younger and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss.
    Hwang JS; Jung Y; Lee JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):701-707. PubMed ID: 33588512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.