These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34260444)
1. Considering the Use of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Young Male Patients: Commentary on an article by Edwin P. Su, MD, et al.: "Results of the First U.S. FDA-Approved Hip Resurfacing Device at 10-Year Follow-up". Brown TS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(14):e56. PubMed ID: 34260444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Still an Alternative?: Commentary on an article by Tobias Reiner, MD, et al.: "MRI Findings in Patients After Small-Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years". Akisue T J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):e101. PubMed ID: 28926395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is There a Role for Surface Replacement Arthroplasty in Today's Orthopaedic Practice?: Commentary on an article by Marcus C. Ford, MD, et al.: "Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S. A Single Institution's Experience". Giori NJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):e142. PubMed ID: 30399089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Metal-on-Metal Testing to Salvage a Device Disaster: Commentary on an article by Gulraj S. Matharu, BSc(Hons), MBChB, MRCS, MRes, et al.: "The Effectiveness of Blood Metal Ions in Identifying Patients with Unilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris". Dorr LD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):e31. PubMed ID: 27098331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ARMD and Presumed Dangerous!: Commentary on an article by Gulraj S. Matharu, BSc(Hons), MRCS, MRes, et al.: "Blood Metal Ion Thresholds to Identify Patients with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants at Risk of Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris. An External Multicenter Validation Study of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing and Corail-Pinnacle Implants". Campbell P; Ebramzadeh E J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 99(18):e100. PubMed ID: 28926394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative Complications and Mid-Term Follow-Up of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Miettinen SSA; Mäkinen TJ; Mäkelä K; Huhtala H; Kettunen JS; Remes V Scand J Surg; 2018 Jun; 107(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 29333941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes. Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical results of the conserve plus metal on metal hip resurfacing: an independent series. Zylberberg AD; Nishiwaki T; Kim PR; Beaulé PE J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 25212284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience. Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Beverland DE; Spencer RF Hip Int; 2011; 21(3):277-8. PubMed ID: 21698573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective comparative study of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in younger patients-a minimum of five year follow-up. Tao R; Liu F; Liu YK; Lu Y; Xu H; Cao Y; Zhou ZY; Wang W Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2323-2327. PubMed ID: 29455347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients under 30 years of age. Woon RP; Johnson AJ; Amstutz HC J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 23433997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Junnila M; Kostensalo I; Virolainen P; Remes V; Matilainen M; Vahlberg T; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Itälä A; Mäkelä K Scand J Surg; 2014 Mar; 103(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 24345980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients aged 65 or older. Le Duff MJ; Takamura KB; Amstutz HC Hip Int; 2012; 22(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 23233179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current expert views on metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Consensus of the 6th advanced Hip resurfacing course, Ghent, Belgium, May 2014. Van Der Straeten C; De Smet KA Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26449333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hip resurfacing and pseudotumour. Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G; Gundle R; Gibbons CL; Whitwell D; Taylor A; Glyn-Jones S; Pandit HG; Ostlere S; Gill HS; Athanasou N; McLardy-Smith P Hip Int; 2011; 21(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 21698574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up. Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How Common Is Revision for Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris After Total Hip Replacement with a Metal-on-Polyethylene Bearing Surface?: Commentary on an article by Anders Persson, MD, et al.: "Revision for Symptomatic Pseudotumor Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Standard Femoral Stem". Ayers DC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jun; 100(11):e82. PubMed ID: 29870456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]