These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34260969)

  • 1. CRTpowerdist: An R package to calculate attained power and construct the power distribution for cross-sectional stepped-wedge and parallel cluster randomized trials.
    Ouyang Y; Xu L; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Wong H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106255. PubMed ID: 34260969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.
    Ouyang Y; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Field TS; Wong H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 32580698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chen J; Zhou X; Li F; Spiegelman D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106522. PubMed ID: 34818620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The randomization-induced risk of a trial failing to attain its target power: assessment and mitigation.
    Wong H; Ouyang Y; Karim ME
    Trials; 2019 Jun; 20(1):360. PubMed ID: 31208463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A hybrid approach to comparing parallel-group and stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with a continuous primary outcome when there is uncertainty in the intra-cluster correlation.
    Sarkodie SK; Wason JM; Grayling MJ
    Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 20(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 36086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    Harrison LJ; Chen T; Wang R
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):951-962. PubMed ID: 31625596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.
    Harrison LJ; Wang R
    Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6674-6688. PubMed ID: 34558112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving efficiency in the stepped-wedge trial design via Bayesian modeling with an informative prior for the time effects.
    Zhan D; Ouyang Y; Xu L; Wong H
    Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 18(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 33813906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal design of cluster randomized trials allowing unequal allocation of clusters and unequal cluster size between arms.
    Copas AJ; Hooper R
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(25):5474-5486. PubMed ID: 34312902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering.
    Teerenstra S; Taljaard M; Haenen A; Huis A; Atsma F; Rodwell L; Hulscher M
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):225-236. PubMed ID: 31018678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.
    Taljaard M; Teerenstra S; Ivers NM; Fergusson DA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 26940696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Toles M; Li F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Jan; 32(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 36253078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a covariate-constrained randomization procedure in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chaussee EL; Dickinson LM; Fairclough DL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Jun; 105():106409. PubMed ID: 33894362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator.
    Hemming K; Kasza J; Hooper R; Forbes A; Taljaard M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):979-995. PubMed ID: 32087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.