187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34261595)
1. Real-world clinical and cost analysis of CT coronary angiography and CT coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR
Graby J; Metters R; Kandan SR; McKenzie D; Lowe R; Carson K; Hudson BJ; Rodrigues JCL
Clin Radiol; 2021 Nov; 76(11):862.e19-862.e28. PubMed ID: 34261595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determinants of Rejection Rate for Coronary CT Angiography Fractional Flow Reserve Analysis.
Pontone G; Weir-McCall JR; Baggiano A; Del Torto A; Fusini L; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Guaricci AI; Andreini D; Patel M; Nieman K; Akasaka T; Rogers C; Nørgaard BL; Bax J; Raff GL; Chinnaiyan K; Berman D; Fairbairn T; Koweek LH; Leipsic J
Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 31335283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Qiao HY; Tang CX; Schoepf UJ; Tesche C; Bayer RR; Giovagnoli DA; Todd Hudson H; Zhou CS; Yan J; Lu MJ; Zhou F; Lu GM; Jiang JW; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5841-5851. PubMed ID: 32462444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact on stable chest pain pathways of CT fractional flow reserve.
O'Leary RA; Burn J; Urwin SG; Sims AJ; Beattie A; Bagnall A
Heart; 2023 Aug; 109(18):1380-1386. PubMed ID: 37080766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Use of CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Emergency Department.
Chinnaiyan KM; Safian RD; Gallagher ML; George J; Dixon SR; Bilolikar AN; Abbas AE; Shoukfeh M; Brodsky M; Stewart J; Cami E; Forst D; Timmis S; Crile J; Raff GL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Feb; 13(2 Pt 1):452-461. PubMed ID: 31326487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study.
Nakazato R; Park HB; Berman DS; Gransar H; Koo BK; Erglis A; Lin FY; Dunning AM; Budoff MJ; Malpeso J; Leipsic J; Min JK
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):881-9. PubMed ID: 24081777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 2-year investigation of the impact of the computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve calculated using a deep learning algorithm on routine decision-making for coronary artery disease management.
Liu X; Mo X; Zhang H; Yang G; Shi C; Hau WK
Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7039-7046. PubMed ID: 33630159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemia-causing coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis.
Ding A; Qiu G; Lin W; Hu L; Lu G; Long X; Hong X; Chen Y; Luo X; Tang Q; Deng D
Jpn J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 34(12):795-808. PubMed ID: 27796727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic efficacy of fractional flow reserve with coronary angiography in dual-source computed tomography scanner.
Xia G; Fan D; Yao X; Guan G; Wang J
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 28830299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion With a Whole-Heart Coverage Scanner in Addition to Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Fractional Flow Reserve Computed Tomography Derived.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Dec; 12(12):2460-2471. PubMed ID: 31005531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Projected costs and consequences of computed tomography-determined fractional flow reserve.
Hlatky MA; Saxena A; Koo BK; Erglis A; Zarins CK; Min JK
Clin Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 36(12):743-8. PubMed ID: 24114863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived from 320-Detector Row CT Angiography to Diagnose Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: An NXT Substudy.
Ko BS; Wong DT; Nørgaard BL; Leong DP; Cameron JD; Gaur S; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Kuribayashi S; Kimura T; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 26444662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve on reader confidence for interpretation of coronary CT angiography.
Artzner C; Daubert M; Ehieli W; Kong D; Mammarappallil J; Nikolaou K; Boll DT; Koweek L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():242-248. PubMed ID: 30396663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationale, design and goals of the HeartFlow assessing diagnostic value of non-invasive FFR
Chinnaiyan KM; Akasaka T; Amano T; Bax JJ; Blanke P; De Bruyne B; Kawasaki T; Leipsic J; Matsuo H; Morino Y; Nieman K; Norgaard BL; Patel MR; Pontone G; Rabbat M; Rogers C; Sand NP; Raff G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28017291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study.
Sand NPR; Veien KT; Nielsen SS; Nørgaard BL; Larsen P; Johansen A; Hess S; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Junker A; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Jensen LO
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1640-1650. PubMed ID: 29909103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of image quality on diagnostic performance of a machine learning-based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography.
Xu PP; Li JH; Zhou F; Jiang MD; Zhou CS; Lu MJ; Tang CX; Zhang XL; Yang L; Zhang YX; Wang YN; Zhang JY; Yu MM; Hou Y; Zheng MW; Zhang B; Zhang DM; Yi Y; Xu L; Hu XH; Liu H; Lu GM; Ni QQ; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2525-2534. PubMed ID: 32006167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
