These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34262101)

  • 1. Environmental DNA reveals the fine-grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fish communities.
    Lamy T; Pitz KJ; Chavez FP; Yorke CE; Miller RJ
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14439. PubMed ID: 34262101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. eDNA captures depth partitioning in a kelp forest ecosystem.
    Monuki K; Barber PH; Gold Z
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0253104. PubMed ID: 34735443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA.
    Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities.
    Clark AJ; Atkinson SR; Scarponi V; Cane T; Geraldi NR; Hendy IW; Shipway JR; Peck M
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17091. PubMed ID: 38708339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-ocean patterns and processes in fish biodiversity on coral reefs through the lens of eDNA metabarcoding.
    Mathon L; Marques V; Mouillot D; Albouy C; Andrello M; Baletaud F; Borrero-Pérez GH; Dejean T; Edgar GJ; Grondin J; Guerin PE; Hocdé R; Juhel JB; Kadarusman ; Maire E; Mariani G; McLean M; Polanco F A; Pouyaud L; Stuart-Smith RD; Sugeha HY; Valentini A; Vigliola L; Vimono IB; Pellissier L; Manel S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Apr; 289(1973):20220162. PubMed ID: 35440210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas.
    Gold Z; Sprague J; Kushner DJ; Zerecero Marin E; Barber PH
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0238557. PubMed ID: 33626067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
    Miya M
    Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of environmental DNA in assessment of fish functional and phylogenetic diversity.
    Marques V; Castagné P; Polanco A; Borrero-Pérez GH; Hocdé R; Guérin PÉ; Juhel JB; Velez L; Loiseau N; Letessier TB; Bessudo S; Valentini A; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Pellissier L; Villéger S
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 34224158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats.
    Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining environmental DNA and visual surveys can inform conservation planning for coral reefs.
    Muenzel D; Bani A; De Brauwer M; Stewart E; Djakiman C; Halwi ; Purnama R; Yusuf S; Santoso P; Hukom FD; Struebig M; Jompa J; Limmon G; Dumbrell A; Beger M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Apr; 121(17):e2307214121. PubMed ID: 38621123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs?
    Stauffer S; Jucker M; Keggin T; Marques V; Andrello M; Bessudo S; Cheutin MC; Borrero-Pérez GH; Richards E; Dejean T; Hocdé R; Juhel JB; Ladino F; Letessier TB; Loiseau N; Maire E; Mouillot D; Mutis Martinezguerra M; Manel S; Polanco Fernández A; Valentini A; Velez L; Albouy C; Pellissier L; Waldock C
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Nov; 11(21):14630-14643. PubMed ID: 34765130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring.
    Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.
    Lin M; Simons AL; Harrigan RJ; Curd EE; Schneider FD; Ruiz-Ramos DV; Gold Z; Osborne MG; Shirazi S; Schweizer TM; Moore TN; Fox EA; Turba R; Garcia-Vedrenne AE; Helman SK; Rutledge K; Mejia MP; Marwayana O; Munguia Ramos MN; Wetzer R; Pentcheff ND; McTavish EJ; Dawson MN; Shapiro B; Wayne RK; Meyer RS
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Sep; 31(6):e02379. PubMed ID: 34013632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA: Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes.
    Zhang S; Lu Q; Wang Y; Wang X; Zhao J; Yao M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):242-255. PubMed ID: 31625686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
    Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
    Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers.
    Broadhurst HA; Gregory LM; Bleakley EK; Perkins JC; Lavin JV; Bolton P; Browett SS; Howe CV; Singleton N; Tansley D; Sales NG; McDevitt AD
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 801():149724. PubMed ID: 34467903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT; Wang RL; Li HT; Liu L; Kuang TX; Li M; Zou KS
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.