These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of Clinical Results, Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings, and MRI Findings Between the Transportal and Outside-In Techniques for Double-Bundle Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Kim JG; Kang SH; Kim JH; Lim CO; Wang JH Am J Sports Med; 2018 Mar; 46(3):544-556. PubMed ID: 29293362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Tiamklang T; Sumanont S; Foocharoen T; Laopaiboon M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD008413. PubMed ID: 23152258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eight-year results of transtibial nonanatomic single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical, radiologic outcomes and survivorship. Yoon KH; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Park M; Park SY; Park SE J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019840827. PubMed ID: 30955412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle versus double-bundle technique: meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials. Xu M; Gao S; Zeng C; Han R; Sun J; Li H; Xiong Y; Lei G Arthroscopy; 2013 Feb; 29(2):357-65. PubMed ID: 23369481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individualized anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective study comparing anatomic single- and double-bundle reconstruction. Hussein M; van Eck CF; Cretnik A; Dinevski D; Fu FH Am J Sports Med; 2012 Aug; 40(8):1781-8. PubMed ID: 22593091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transtibial vs anatomical single bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Kilinc BE; Kara A; Oc Y; Celik H; Camur S; Bilgin E; Erten YT; Sahinkaya T; Eren OT Int J Surg; 2016 May; 29():62-9. PubMed ID: 26987514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-bundle or double-bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Li YL; Ning GZ; Wu Q; Wu QL; Li Y; Hao Y; Feng SQ Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 23306028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up. Karikis I; Desai N; Sernert N; Rostgard-Christensen L; Kartus J Am J Sports Med; 2016 May; 44(5):1225-36. PubMed ID: 26948548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. No Difference in the KOOS Quality of Life Subscore Between Anatomic Double-Bundle and Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial With 2 Years' Follow-up. Aga C; Risberg MA; Fagerland MW; Johansen S; Trøan I; Heir S; Engebretsen L Am J Sports Med; 2018 Aug; 46(10):2341-2354. PubMed ID: 30021073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-bundle versus double-bundle autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials at 5-year minimum follow-up. Chen H; Chen B; Tie K; Fu Z; Chen L J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 13(1):50. PubMed ID: 29523208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Li X; Xu CP; Song JQ; Jiang N; Yu B Int Orthop; 2013 Feb; 37(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 22968440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Svantesson E; Sundemo D; Hamrin Senorski E; Alentorn-Geli E; Musahl V; Fu FH; Desai N; Stålman A; Samuelsson K Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Dec; 25(12):3884-3891. PubMed ID: 27882413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results. Youm YS; Cho SD; Lee SH; Youn CH Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2941-7. PubMed ID: 25269655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Hussein M; van Eck CF; Cretnik A; Dinevski D; Fu FH Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 22085729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Double-bundle reconstruction results in superior clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction. Zhu Y; Tang RK; Zhao P; Zhu SS; Li YG; Li JB Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 May; 21(5):1085-96. PubMed ID: 22673793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The transportal technique shows better clinical results than the transtibial techniques for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ro KH; Kim HJ; Lee DH Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Aug; 26(8):2371-2380. PubMed ID: 29189882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]