These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34263691)

  • 1. Can anteroposterior skeletal pattern be determined from a silhouetted profile photograph? A cross-sectional study.
    Schwabe SA; Caldwell S
    J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 49(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 34263691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the sagittal skeletal pattern using dental cast and facial profile photographs in children aged 9 to 14 years.
    Sukhia RH; Nuruddin R; Azam SI; Fida M
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2022 Nov; 72(11):2198-2203. PubMed ID: 37013286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
    Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
    Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.
    Paddenberg E; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 34255093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions with vertical skeletal pattern.
    Plaza SP; Reimpell A; Silva J; Montoya D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 24(4):63-72. PubMed ID: 31508708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic concordance between skeletal cephalometrics, radiograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics, and photograph-based soft-tissue cephalometrics.
    Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio M; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Cordasco G
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):352-357. PubMed ID: 27932406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Beta and ANB Angles for Evaluation of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy: A Cephalometric Study.
    Jajoo A; Agarkar SS; Sharma S; Gadhiya N; Sonawane S; Narkhede S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):739-742. PubMed ID: 29959305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of dentoalveolar compensation in skeletal class II malocclusion in a Pakistani University Hospital setting.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Jan; 19(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19149973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in anteroposterior position and inclination of the maxillary incisors after surgical-orthodontic treatment of skeletal class III malocclusions.
    Zou B; Zhou Y; Lowe AA; Li H; Pliska B
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):1986-93. PubMed ID: 26439521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Palatal Plane and Occlusal Plane for Determining Anteroposterior Jaw Relation.
    Pyakurel U; Thapaliya KB; Singh K; Gupta A; Gupta S; Bajracharya M; Shrestha RM; Mishra P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2019; 57(215):3-7. PubMed ID: 31080237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
    Baik CY; Ververidou M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.