These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34264594)

  • 1. Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: Surgical vs. Conservative Interventions.
    Yancey JR; Szczepanik M
    Am Fam Physician; 2021 Jul; 104(1):28-29. PubMed ID: 34264594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CORR Synthesis: What Is the Most Effective Treatment for Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations?
    Duffett RW; Duralde XA; Marcus RE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 May; 481(5):1008-1013. PubMed ID: 36728233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arthroscopic reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by suspensory fixation for management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation and MRI follow-up study.
    Yin W; Li H; Zhou D; Huang X; Zhu W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Apr; 45(4):400-405. PubMed ID: 32879064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Management of dislocated glenoid fossa fracture with acromioclavicular joint rupture].
    Albersdörfer H
    Aktuelle Traumatol; 1993 Nov; 23(7):337-8. PubMed ID: 7906088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acromioclavicular joint injuries in sport. Recommendations for treatment.
    Dias JJ; Gregg PJ
    Sports Med; 1991 Feb; 11(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 2017605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Attach importance to the repair of acromioclavicular joint complex to improve the curative effect of unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation].
    Xing JF
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2020 Aug; 33(8):693-5. PubMed ID: 32875755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation: Conservative vs surgical approach. A systematic review and meta-analysis of current concepts in literature.
    Giai Via R; Bosco F; Giustra F; Lavia AD; Artiaco S; Risitano S; Giachino M; Massè A
    Injury; 2022 Oct; 53(10):3094-3101. PubMed ID: 35945090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Boström Windhamre H; von Heideken J; Une-Larsson V; Ekström W; Ekelund A
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1122-1136. PubMed ID: 35007749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atraumatic posterior dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with voluntary reduction.
    Sahara W; Sugamoto K; Miwa T; Tanaka H; Yoshikawa H
    Clin J Sport Med; 2005 Mar; 15(2):104-6. PubMed ID: 15782056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Proceedings in shoulder surgery].
    Biberthaler P; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2008 May; 150(18):40-1, 43. PubMed ID: 18533608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experiences in the nailing of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint according to Bosworth].
    KUCHENREUTER G
    Chirurg; 1956 Jun; 27(6):250-2. PubMed ID: 13343430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.
    Cerciello S; Corona K; Morris BJ; Proietti L; Mercurio M; Cattaneo S; Milano G
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Jun; 30(6):2084-2091. PubMed ID: 34841469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint.
    Mehrberg RD; Lobel SM; Gibson WK
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2004 Aug; 15(3):v, 537-55. PubMed ID: 15219889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subcoracoid dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint.
    Canbora KM; Tüzüner T; Yanik SH; Görgeç M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2011; 45(6):463-5. PubMed ID: 22245825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
    Hu F; Han S; Liu F; Wang Z; Jia H; Wang F; Hu L; Chen J; Wang B; Yang Y
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):15. PubMed ID: 34980065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dynamic stabilization of acromioclavicular joint dislocation].
    Leithe J; Starke W; Amon K; Schilling H
    Chirurg; 1982 Jan; 53(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7060430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.
    Feichtinger X; Dahm F; Schallmayer D; Boesmueller S; Fialka C; Mittermayr R
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 32748232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A point system for the comparative evaluation of the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations].
    Sánta S; Záborszky Z
    Magy Traumatol Ortop Kezseb Plasztikai Seb; 1993; 36(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8343837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single tunnel technique versus coracoid sling technique for arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
    Peng L; Zheng Y; Chen S; Yang S; Liu J; Cheng C; Zhang G; Deng Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4244. PubMed ID: 35273203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clavicular hook plate for acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocation involving Rockwood type V: clinical and radiological outcomes and complications evaluation.
    Liu G; Hu Y; Ye F; Huang F; Yu T
    Int Orthop; 2022 Oct; 46(10):2405-2411. PubMed ID: 35854054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.