These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34264726)

  • 1. Similarities and differences: Comment on Chan et al. (2021).
    Jones PM; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Spicer SG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):216-217. PubMed ID: 34264726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting the Rescorla-Wagner (1972) theory: A reply to Spicer et al. (2020).
    Chan YY; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(2):211-215. PubMed ID: 34264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Blake KL; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of uncertainty in regulating associative change.
    Chan YY; Lee JC; Fam JP; Westbrook RF; Holmes NM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(2):77-98. PubMed ID: 38587939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theory protection in associative learning: Humans maintain certain beliefs in a manner that violates prediction error.
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 31556642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combination of common and individual error terms is not needed to explain associative changes when cues with different training histories are conditioned in compound: A review of Rescorla's compound test procedure.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 30945928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the stimulus processing assumptions of the sometimes-opponent-process (SOP) model explain instances of contextual learning?
    Vogel EH; Ponce FP; Brandon SE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):205-214. PubMed ID: 32730079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative cognition-Conceptual and methodological advancements.
    Delamater AR; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(3):219-222. PubMed ID: 34618523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When the stimulus is predicted and what the stimulus predicts: Alternative accounts of habituation.
    Hall G; Rodríguez G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):327-340. PubMed ID: 32730085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).
    Reicher SD; Van Bavel JJ; Haslam SA
    Am Psychol; 2020 Apr; 75(3):406-407. PubMed ID: 32250145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Special issue to commemorate the intellectual contributions of Allan R. Wagner.
    Delamater AR; Whitlow JWB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):165-169. PubMed ID: 32730076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inference from explanation.
    Kirfel L; Icard T; Gerstenberg T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jul; 151(7):1481-1501. PubMed ID: 34928680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactions between the elements of an outcome in human associative learning.
    Quigley M; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 32730083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing a mission of translational intervention science: Comment on premature implementation.
    Beidas RS; Saldana L; Shelton RC
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2024 May; 92(5):324-326. PubMed ID: 38829331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning mechanisms underlying accurate and biased contingency judgments.
    Matute H; Blanco F; Díaz-Lago M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):373-389. PubMed ID: 31380677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The redundancy effect is related to a lack of conditioned inhibition: Evidence from a task in which excitation and inhibition are symmetrical.
    Zaksaite T; Jones PM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Feb; 73(2):260-278. PubMed ID: 31498020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An application of Wagner's Standard Operating Procedures or Sometimes Opponent Processes (SOP) model to experimental extinction.
    Holmes NM; Chan YY; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):215-234. PubMed ID: 32730080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unconscious or underpowered? Probabilistic cuing of visual attention.
    Vadillo MA; Linssen D; Orgaz C; Parsons S; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):160-181. PubMed ID: 31246061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of alternative formats to the Likert format: A comment on Wilson et al. (2022).
    Zhang X; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Jun; 29(3):606-612. PubMed ID: 39311829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Testing one or multiple: How beliefs about sparsity affect causal experimentation": Correction to Coenen et al. (2019).
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jan; 49(1):177. PubMed ID: 33555908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.