BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34264935)

  • 1. Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.
    Markkula G; Uludağ Z; Wilkie RM; Billington J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009096. PubMed ID: 34264935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Centroparietal activity mirrors the decision variable when tracking biased and time-varying sensory evidence.
    Kohl C; Spieser L; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Nov; 122():101321. PubMed ID: 32592971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments.
    Ruesseler M; Weber LA; Marshall TR; O'Reilly J; Hunt LT
    Elife; 2023 Oct; 12():. PubMed ID: 37883173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreasing Alertness Modulates Perceptual Decision-Making.
    Jagannathan SR; Bareham CA; Bekinschtein TA
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):454-473. PubMed ID: 34815316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.
    Yau Y; Hinault T; Taylor M; Cisek P; Fellows LK; Dagher A
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5711-5722. PubMed ID: 34035140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports.
    Twomey DM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(28):7346-52. PubMed ID: 27413146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurodynamic Evidence Supports a Forced-Excursion Model of Decision-Making under Speed/Accuracy Instructions.
    Spieser L; Kohl C; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29951578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The EEG signature of sensory evidence accumulation during decision formation closely tracks subjective perceptual experience.
    Tagliabue CF; Veniero D; Benwell CSY; Cecere R; Savazzi S; Thut G
    Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4949. PubMed ID: 30894558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal and external influences on the rate of sensory evidence accumulation in the human brain.
    Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    J Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 33(50):19434-41. PubMed ID: 24336710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expectations Do Not Alter Early Sensory Processing during Perceptual Decision-Making.
    Rungratsameetaweemana N; Itthipuripat S; Salazar A; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(24):5632-5648. PubMed ID: 29773755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.
    van den Brink RL; Murphy PR; Desender K; de Ru N; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):130-143. PubMed ID: 33172980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.
    Itthipuripat S; Cha K; Deering S; Salazar AM; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8635-8649. PubMed ID: 30143576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making.
    Purcell BA; Heitz RP; Cohen JY; Schall JD; Logan GD; Palmeri TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1113-43. PubMed ID: 20822291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural processes underlying perceptual decision making in humans: recent progress and future directions.
    Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    J Physiol Paris; 2015; 109(1-3):27-37. PubMed ID: 25204272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Specific Relationship between the Shape of the Readiness Potential, Subjective Decision Time, and Waiting Time Predicted by an Accumulator Model with Temporally Autocorrelated Input Noise.
    Schurger A
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 29464192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A low-frequency oscillatory neural signal in humans encodes a developing decision variable.
    Kubanek J; Snyder LH; Brunton BW; Brody CD; Schalk G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():795-808. PubMed ID: 23872495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation between centro-parietal positivity and diffusion model parameters in both perceptual and memory-based decision making.
    van Vugt MK; Beulen MA; Taatgen NA
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1715():1-12. PubMed ID: 30876858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.
    Devine CA; Gaffney C; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
    Elife; 2019 Nov; 8():. PubMed ID: 31774396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuronal signatures of a random-dot motion comparison task.
    von Lautz A; Herding J; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():57-66. PubMed ID: 30849531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human scalp potentials reflect a mixture of decision-related signals during perceptual choices.
    Philiastides MG; Heekeren HR; Sajda P
    J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 34(50):16877-89. PubMed ID: 25505339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.