BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34266709)

  • 21. Abortion care in Haiti: A secondary analysis of demographic and health data.
    Meffen K; Burkhardt G; Bartels S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206967. PubMed ID: 30408133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practices Regarding Rape-related Pregnancy in U.S. Abortion Care Settings.
    Perry R; Murphy M; Rankin KM; Cowett A; Harwood B
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26621607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Women's preferences for the location of abortion services: a pilot study in two Chicago clinics.
    Logsdon MB; Handler A; Godfrey EM
    Matern Child Health J; 2012 Jan; 16(1):212-6. PubMed ID: 21107667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pathways to Abortion at a Tertiary Care Hospital: Examining Obesity and Delays.
    Frarey A; Schreiber C; McAllister A; Shaber A; Sonalkar S; Sammel MD; Long JA
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2019 Mar; 51(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30645011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. "I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.
    Raifman S; Ralph L; Biggs MA; Grossman D
    Reprod Health; 2021 May; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 33947413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A mystery client study of crisis pregnancy center practices in New York State.
    Frasik C; Jordan C; McLeod C; Flink-Bochacki R
    Contraception; 2023 Jan; 117():36-38. PubMed ID: 36055360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selecting an Abortion Clinic: The Role of Social Myths and Risk Perception in Seeking Abortion Care.
    Heymann O; Odum T; Norris AH; Bessett D
    J Health Soc Behav; 2022 Mar; 63(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 34605701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Time from first clinical contact to abortion in Texas and California.
    Adams M; Kully G; Tilford S; White K; Mody S; Hildebrand M; Johns N; Grossman D; Averbach S
    Contraception; 2022 Jun; 110():76-80. PubMed ID: 34971611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cross-sectional study examining consideration of self-managed abortion among people seeking facility-based care in the United States.
    Ralph L; Ehrenreich K; Kaller S; Biggs MA
    Reprod Health; 2022 Aug; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 35962384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina.
    Bryant AG; Speizer IS; Hodgkinson JC; Swiatlo A; Curtis SL; Perreira K
    South Med J; 2018 Jun; 111(6):317-323. PubMed ID: 29863217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion method preference among people presenting for abortion care.
    Wingo E; Ralph LJ; Kaller S; Biggs MA
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):269-275. PubMed ID: 33373612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. First-trimester aspiration abortion practices: a survey of United States abortion providers.
    White KO; Jones HE; Lavelanet A; Norman WV; Guilbert E; Lichtenberg ES; Paul M
    Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 30125557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prevalence of rape-related pregnancy as an indication for abortion at two urban family planning clinics.
    Perry R; Zimmerman L; Al-Saden I; Fatima A; Cowett A; Patel A
    Contraception; 2015 May; 91(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 25636805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. COVID-19 and Independent Abortion Providers: Findings from a Rapid-Response Survey.
    Roberts SCM; Schroeder R; Joffe C
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 52(4):217-225. PubMed ID: 33289197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ragsdale v. Turnock, 10 March 1988, as amended on 13 April 1988.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():44-5. PubMed ID: 12289569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Abortion Web Ecosystem: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Trustworthiness and Bias.
    Han L; Boniface ER; Han LY; Albright J; Doty N; Darney BG
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e20619. PubMed ID: 33104002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
    Ahmed A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 25846038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Free, but at what cost? How US crisis pregnancy centres provide services.
    Kissling A; Gursahaney P; Norris AH; Bessett D; Gallo MF
    Cult Health Sex; 2023 Aug; 25(8):1024-1038. PubMed ID: 36063457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How do women interpret abortion information they find online?
    Forbes M; Darney BG; Ramanadhan S; Earp M; Waldner-James L; Han L
    Contraception; 2021 Apr; 103(4):276-281. PubMed ID: 33454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association of Facility Type With Procedural-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events Among Patients Undergoing Induced Abortions.
    Roberts SCM; Upadhyay UD; Liu G; Kerns JL; Ba D; Beam N; Leslie DL
    JAMA; 2018 Jun; 319(24):2497-2506. PubMed ID: 29946727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.