These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34266934)
21. Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease. Zigler JE; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 23082846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. van den Eerenbeemt KD; Ostelo RW; van Royen BJ; Peul WC; van Tulder MW Eur Spine J; 2010 Aug; 19(8):1262-80. PubMed ID: 20508954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion. Zigler JE; Glenn J; Delamarter RB J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 23082849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does 360° lumbar spinal fusion improve long-term clinical outcomes after failure of conservative treatment in patients with functionally disabling single-level degenerative lumbar disc disease? Results of 5-year follow-up in 75 postoperative patients. Zigler JE; Delamarter RB Int J Spine Surg; 2013; 7():e1-7. PubMed ID: 25694895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2230-6. PubMed ID: 16205353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study. Zigler JE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S163-6. PubMed ID: 14560187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies. Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative disc disease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute. Park CK; Ryu KS; Lee KY; Lee HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(8):672-7. PubMed ID: 21857395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial. Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on the outcome of lumbar total disc replacement: analysis of prospective 5-year follow-up study data. Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Ohnmeiss DD Eur Spine J; 2023 Mar; 32(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 36520212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article. Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Milby AH; Anakwenze OA; Balderston RA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 19927100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2. Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up. Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article. Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis. Demetropoulos CK; Sengupta DK; Knaub MA; Wiater BP; Abjornson C; Truumees E; Herkowitz HN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]